LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2010
- 48,402
- 16,888
I don't know if Thornton is fast enough to play with Matthews and Marner
oh for sure you could easily swap line combos and that be that but 56 game shorten season is a bit iffy to be throwing together these types of line combos i feel . As well that opposing team isnt going to take too long to figure out who the shooter is going to be on that passer/shooter/passer top line . At least with Willy beside Matthews a team could never be too sure. Doubtful but if it works then greatI wouldn't look too deep into it. There will be plenty of mixing up, this is an early "shock" for players and fans alike to expect a different season with plenty of tinkering. What is more of a surprise than Joe playing wing on the 1st line?
Players all know now, "anything is possible". Perform and expect constant uncertainties in a very different season (in a most different year).
I don't know if Thornton is fast enough to play with Matthews and Marner
did I say that you did? All I’m doing is commenting on him being on the first line with marner and matthews
I don't know if Thornton is fast enough to play with Matthews and Marner
No, this is your third post in a row disputing a pro rated 40-45 point projection. So you need to sort out whether your critique is:
1) 40-45 point pace for Joe Thornton is not achievable.
2) 40-45 points pace for Thornton at 1st line LW would be too low relative to the position.
Not much of a diff from Johnson or kappy as I see it. In any event, better deploy him on the first line when he is fresh than at the end of the season.on the first line with matthews and marner? Yeah I’d say that’s pretty bad. Please read carefully though not 45 points 45 pace so actually 27-32 points (ish) people here hoping for that if he is on a line with matthews and marner that’s terrible
Not much of a diff from Johnson or kappy as I see it. In any event, better deploy him on the first line when he is fresh than at the end of the season.
Well, playing with Matthews and Marner is still to be seen what results they have. For my money, I’m not betting against Thornton going assist crazy this year.or never perhaps? Kapanen for his lack of iq can skate so can johnsson. If Thornton was at all capable of playing top 6 mins more than spot duty he’d be signed for more than $700k and likely still in San Jose. I have no problem with signing him for his locker room leadership and I believe he can help us but not holding back our elite talents in the top 6.
I don't know if Thornton is fast enough to play with Matthews and Marner
Maybe you should relax and let him play a couple of games before u pull out the pitchforksor never perhaps? Kapanen for his lack of iq can skate so can johnsson. If Thornton was at all capable of playing top 6 mins more than spot duty he’d be signed for more than $700k and likely still in San Jose. I have no problem with signing him for his locker room leadership and I believe he can help us but not holding back our elite talents in the top 6.
Maybe that adds a dimension with him coming late. It’s opposite to what Hyman does in getting there first. Rag the puck, wait for Joe, pass the puck to him and go find some open ice. Thornton uses his defensemen well to. It will be more high/low with him in there. Hyman kept everything low. It’s different for sure. Jumbo can cycle with the best of them still.I don't know if Thornton is fast enough to play with Matthews and Marner
I don't think he has to be. He's smart enough, given he has some legs at all.I don't know if Thornton is fast enough to play with Matthews and Marner
both are true. It’s not achievable without marner and matthews (or nylander tavares for that matter) and it’s no where near enough for a player playing alongside that caliber of player.
maybe I misquoted you a few posts back because my whole point was about him being on the 1st line is a waste of matthews and marner
Edit: I’m happy he is on the team but should not rise above the 3rd line except very rare circumstances
We should be happy keefe is trying different things. Without knowing his exact strategy, it is possible there are a number of things he is trying to achieve.Seems a bit odd putting him on the top line at his age.
I would have thought they would try to shelter him with fewer minutes.
I do wonder if he can keep up the pace that's needed to play top-line minutes.
This. If hyman stabilizes the third line. And Thornton can pick up 35 points minimum without being a boat anchor, that’s a win win.No, this is your third post in a row disputing a pro rated 40-45 point projection. So you need to sort out whether your critique is:
1) 40-45 point pace for Joe Thornton is not achievable.
2) 40-45 points pace for Thornton at 1st line LW would be too low relative to the position.
Anything is possible. Teemu Selanne put up 80 points at 40 with arguably less firepowerThis. If hyman stabilizes the third line. And Thornton can pick up 35 points minimum without being a boat anchor, that’s a win win.
I agree. But I don’t expect near that. I know you don’t either and neither does any reasonable fan. Thornton will be secondary scoring. Selanne was still used as a primary scorer at the time. And Ice time directly effects point totals. Selanne also had much better wheels. It’ll be interesting that’s for sure.Anything is possible. Teemu Selanne put up 80 points at 40 with arguably less firepower
They were a run and gun team for sure. One thing keeps me curious of Thorton on the leafs. His possession stats are really really good. This line could see a bonafide monkey in the middle scenario that could really frustrate opponents. Matthews might be firing a machine gun with the looks he gets.I agree. But I don’t expect near that. I know you don’t either and neither does any reasonable fan. Thornton will be secondary scoring. Selanne was still used as a primary scorer at the time. And Ice time directly effects point totals. Selanne also had much better wheels. It’ll be interesting that’s for sure.
I don't know if Thornton is fast enough to play with Matthews and Marner