Kevin Porter is an NHL player on a last place team.
He would have more goals than Stafford and Hecht combined if he got half their ice time.
So he'd have 1 goal?
Kevin Porter is an NHL player on a last place team.
He would have more goals than Stafford and Hecht combined if he got half their ice time.
Unfortunately for your silly Hecht argument, there's also more to hockey than your 4th line, fringe NHL player's ability in preventing goals.Since we're now engaging in bald speculation, I'll counter that by saying we'd be giving up a goal/game more if Porter was in there in place of Hecht. In half the ice time. Prove me wrong.
Unfortunately for your silly Hecht argument, there's also more to hockey than your 4th line, fringe NHL player's ability in preventing goals.
You're so funny!And, as we all know, Porter both produces and prevents goals. Which is why he got non-tendered by Colorado and couldn't get a one-way deal.
You're so funny!
What does Colorado have to do with Jochen Hecht and his fringe position on the last place team in the East? Once again, Hecht wouldn't be in the NHL if he wasn't in Buffalo. Your argument is worthy for sure.
Kevin Porter is a very good AHL player that's almost averaing a point per game.
You may even call him a fringe NHL player, which is exactly what Jochen Hecht currently is.
If Hecht wasn't playing for the Sabres, he wouldn't be playing in any other NHL city.
Porter is also an actual centerman, unlike Hecht. The Sabres could use a real pivot their 4th line.
Porter puts up enough points to center an NHL 4th line, he hits, fights to protect his teammates, hustles, is an excellent two-way player at the AHL level, and is the Captain of a team that has found it's way and hit its stride, in the midst of losing three of it's best players in Hodgson, Foligno, and Brennan.
What does Jochen Hecht bring that makes him more valuable than the much younger and hungrier Kevin Porter? Certainly not Hecht's penalty killing, which leads all Sabres forwards in average SH TOI. A penalty killing unit which happens to rank in the bottom half of the NHL. Certainly not his offensive touch, as he has none. Certainly not his physical play, which he's never had.
So, what exactly is it about Jochen Hecht that makes you shrug off giving Kevin Porter a shot on the 4th line over him?
Hecht is actually a hockey equivalent of a quadruple-A baseball player. He's also one solid jolt away from permanent retirement. I fail to see how Hecht is so much more valuable to this team than Porter could be.
You're so funny!
What does Colorado have to do with Jochen Hecht and his fringe position on the last place team in the East? Once again, Hecht wouldn't be in the NHL if he wasn't in Buffalo. Your argument is worthy for sure.
Unfortunately for your silly Hecht argument, there's also more to hockey than your 4th line, fringe NHL player's ability in preventing goals.
Wrong. Just Porter.Holy ****! A pt per game in the AHL!!! With our trouble scoring we should get Mancari up here too! immediately !!!
Jochen Hecht's skills dimished well before this year, expert #2.There's a difference between a guy who has succeeded at the NHL level and has diminishing skills. And a guy who never stuck in the NHL, and had very little talent to begin with
Jochen Hecht already has.prove it...
Because Hecht has an idiot for a head coach that has constantly played him out of position.Hecht has played more center professionally at any level, than Porter has.
Jochen Hecht should have retired prior to last season. Deal with it.Porter is a career AHLer.... get over it
Actually, no. That's not my suggestion at all. We don't need Kevin Porter to kill penalties. We also don't need Jochen Hecht to kill penalties. We have plenty of quality PK'ers whether Hecht is here or not.Your suggestion is that Porter would be a better NHL PKer than Hecht? It's becoming clearer and clearer how little you know.
Would be an upgrade on the Sabres 4th line.Kevin Porter
We have plenty of quality PK'ers whether Hecht is here or not.
A layman's argument compared to what? You and your pal's argument? You guys are cute.I'm all for calling up Porter, and giving him a shot... why not. We've got plenty of underachievers.... but the idea that he's a better roster option than Jochen "My 2 way play and PK is still a relevant and necessary element" Hecht is just totally absurd
it's a layman's argument
Who are these quality PKers??? Pominville, Kaleta, Ott.........and who else?????
Hodgson is a PK regular. Stafford has been fine on the PK. As has Vanek when he's been used there.
I don't know....are 7 penalty killing forwards enough??????
And Vanek is only used on the PK during the last 20 seconds or when we desperately need offense.
.
That's because Ruff is an idiot. Vanek is very good at killing penalties, no reason why he shouldn't get more SHTOI.
You're so funny!
What does Colorado have to do with Jochen Hecht and his fringe position on the last place team in the East? Once again, Hecht wouldn't be in the NHL if he wasn't in Buffalo. Your argument is worthy for sure.
CoHo and Stafford are being used on the PK because we don't have other options.
CoHo certainly isn't "quality" yet as you say.........and Stafford I believe has been on the ice for the most PP goals against as a forward.
And Vanek is only used on the PK during the last 20 seconds or when we desperately need offense.
EVENTUALLY, Zemgus, Foligno, CoHo et al should be the core PKers for this team. But right now, Hecht is a good guy to teach them how to PK effectively.
That actually surprises me.
That's because Ruff is an idiot. Vanek is very good at killing penalties, no reason why he shouldn't get more SHTOI.
That actually surprises me.
http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...BUF&f7=10-&c=0+1+3+5+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28#
Yeah. 4-on-5 is a fickle animal.
pominville is on the ice for an additional 50 seconds of pk time per game.
pominville is on the ice for an additional 50 seconds of pk time per game.