Why yes! Yes, you're right. Tim Berni is, indeed, no longer with our organization. Or, for that matter, any NHL organization. Imagine that.
Remember when Berni was looking surprisingly decent and working hard and by surprise made the team and looked like he might be a solid depth guy? He was 22 that year. Who else meets that description?
No ideaI don’t believe he’s a guy well ranked in their prospect pool, is he?
Why yes! Yes, you're right. Tim Berni is, indeed, no longer with our organization. Or, for that matter, any NHL organization. Imagine that.
Remember when Berni was looking surprisingly decent and working hard and by surprise made the team and looked like he might be a solid depth guy? He was 22 that year. Who else meets that description?
Everyone did, which makes me think he asked for a trade.I feel like we gave up on Jiricek too quickly.
You're arguing against giving away bad players for free? What are any of them doing right now? Waddell has been great at taking out the trash. Love where we're heading.Cool. That's one guy out of all of him plus Berni, Bean, Blankenburg, Bjork, and Boqvist. All of whom were given away for free. At that rate we'd be getting ourselves a solid depth player just by getting back another four such guys to go with Hunt and Harris.
A late first. And later rounds. Nothing proven coming backA 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th is nothing lol
Do you think maybe the players were just worth nothing? Or are other teams just obligated to help us out? Because we get mad at other teams for implying that.No, I'm arguing against giving away borderline depth players for free and then trading away valuable assets to replace those borderline depth players with even more borderline depth players. We've so far managed two of five with Harris and Hunt. Who'll replace the other three?
We added a piece who can either potentially be a call up if an injury or a trade (Provorov) happens and not disrupt Cleveland. Also those draft picks AT BEST likely aren't going to even be sniffing a CBJ roster spot for 18+ months. Hunt, being put into the right position, could possibly blossom as an NHLer in the next 2-10 months. While also continuing to give us extra draft capital over the next 3 years. We've potentially added to the roster this year when it wasn't likely Jiricek would at all.So we decided to not take first rounders and instead go with a 3rd round pick player and a late first ?
No, we gave away all those other boners you mentioned for free because THEY were worth nothing. Are any of them even remotely doing anything right now?Ah. So now Jiricek was worth nothing all along. This is an interesting cope strategy.
Why? Voronkov has actually shown to be a strong NHL player already. Did Don Waddell kick your dog or something? Teams don't have to do us favors. Cats out of the bag, Jiricek can't skate and that impacted his value heavily.We had five guys who were borderline depth. They were deemed useless and given away for free.
We now have two more guys who are borderline depth. But they were somehow deemed super-valuable enough to spend much more valuable assets on to acquire them, which has apparently convinced folks that they're something other than borderline depth. Well, except that by now Harris has actually shown what he's legitimately capable of so folks have given up there now.
What's the next valuable asset we're going to trade away for more similarly "useless" borderline depth? I'm placing my bets on Voronkov.
I am dramatically underwhelmed by the return in this trade but this is just a bad take made in anger.Not a single one of those assets will amount to anything even remotely supportive of anything even distantly resembling a plan.
No, I'm arguing against giving away borderline depth players for free and then trading away valuable assets to replace those borderline depth players with even more borderline depth players. We've so far managed two of five with Harris and Hunt. Who'll replace the other three?