When you’ve shown you cannot make an unbaised judgment you shouldn’t be voting for NHL awards.
Yeah... that's pretty bad. I don't know how anyone with credentials could justify picking three Oilers and completely ignore Bobrovsky and/or Barkov.
Voters are allowed to submit conditional ballots. They collect them with about 10 minutes left. You can have a ballot that says "McDavid, then Hyman, but if Florida wins, McDavid then Barkov"I suppose the charitable explanation is that he was assuming the Oilers would win Game 7 and just didn't bother to update his ballot. But even then...
When you’ve shown you cannot make an unbaised judgment you shouldn’t be voting for NHL awards.
exactly, not sure why bouchard is there but hyman was 4th in points and first in goals by a good marginMatheson should retire but in this case it's really not that unreasonable to have McDavid and the top goal scorer of the playoffs and the top point-producing dman of the playoffs on the ballot. It's not how I would have voted, but others had two Oilers. Since the outcome is unknown, voting Skinner, for example, at that juncture is also perfectly reasonable.
Florida's win was a quintessential team effort. Ekblad might have garnered a vote as well.
Having Hyman on the ballot isn't crazy, but not having any of the Panthers players on the ballot at all is just asinine.I mean hyman did score 15 goals in the playoffs. its not that crazy