Toggle sidebar

Proposal: Jets & Sens - Mark Stone

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Johnny HFBOARDS

Johnny HFBOARDS

Trade you!
Dec 10, 2011
14,033
7,611
Earth
Starting this because I want to see how much it would HURT to acquire Mark Stone and also it would be awesome to have with play again with Mark Scheifele.

So I'll start.


:jets
Bryan Little+Drew Stafford+Kyle Connor
:sens
Mark Stone+<L D-Man>+<small Cap Dump>

Really could have offered many other things but that just leaves room for your adjustments!

Let it Flow.
airbender-star-wars-6.jpeg
Click to read more...
 
Jets can't trade a C for another wing. Try thinking about teams needs in the future
 
delete this thread as soon as possible

or offer more laine

im serious

after karlsson its stone in terms of skill and value on ottawa
 
Value isn't too far off, but just no. Sens will never trade Stone. He'll be one of the best wingers in the league very soon.
 
thats an awful offer for Stone. If you guys want Stone its likely gonna cost u guys players like Scheffele, Trouba+, Laine-.
 
Okay then I trade you Scheifele+ for Stone so I can watch Scheifele and Stone to play together in Winnipeg!

:facepalm:

Hunter368 said:
No need for Stone. No thx
Click to expand...

And yeah there is a need for a Stone on this Jets team, when I look at our lineups and the coaching/goalie systems we have, there's room for a lot more than just Stone.

My Jets goggles aren't as think as some others are; I can dream a little for better hockey days.
 
Last edited:
Respeck said:
Stone's value is at an all-time low, who knows if he'll ever be the same player with these concussion issues.
Click to expand...

His value isnt anywhere near all time low... he was a 6th round draft pick remember.

And nobody has any concerns about Stone being able to come back. He'll be back and better then ever
 
You're eye skills are legendary even on HF, hence the part where I asked you to FIX and make it hurt.

Wow did D Trump build a hockey wall around your hockey trade imaginations; sit in this bubble and nothing gets through except Stamley Cups?
 
gholas said:
You're eye skills are legendary even on HF, hence the part where I asked you to FIX and make it hurt.

Wow did D Trump build a hockey wall around your hockey trade imaginations; sit in this bubble and nothing gets through except Stamley Cups?
Click to expand...

there is no fix. Stone is simply untouchable
 
LEAFANFORLIFE23 said:
Mark Stone is not worth Laine on any planet in any universe
Click to expand...

to ottawa he is, which is also a polite way of saying he is untouchable. I would have also said Scheifele but OP wants stone to play with Scheifele so yeah

I also do realize the jets are going to **** no to trading laine for pretty much anyone right now, but if you want the 2nd most valuable player off ottawa, who leads the league in takeaways by a wide margin iirc and is one of the top 2 way forwards in the game then you have to pay up

not that complicated
 
I'd do it for Laine. Nothing else would make sense. I'd think about:

Scheifele
Ehlers

for

Stone
Brassard
 
The problem with Ottawa trading for futures is that everyone here is convinced Karlsson is going to leave when his contract is up if this team can't compete. If Ottawa were to trade Stone for a package where Connor was the central piece, means Ottawa pushes their window back another 3-4 years. Is Connor and Little worth losing Stone and Karlsson? Hell no. Is Laine worth it? No. In a vacuum, Stone doesn't get Laine, but this isn't a vacuum.

Ottawa has demonstrated they're building a roster to compete now (see: Brassard trade.) Trading Stone doesn't work unless it makes the team better right now, and there isn't any thing the Jets have that I could think of that makes Ottawa better right now (within reasonable expectations of a trade.)
 
LEAFANFORLIFE23 said:
Mark Stone is not worth Laine on any planet in any universe
Click to expand...



Stone has been in the league for 2 years, narrowly lost the Calder to Ekblad and finished 2nd in voting.

He scored over 20g and 60p in both years and was #1 in the league in takeaways in both years, leading by 66% in his second year.

Laine is likely going to be a better offensive player than Stone and will likely put up more points, but Stone is good for 60-70 points a year at least and guaranteed to be a puck possession monster and excellent defensive player.

So no, I reject your statement unless you're virtually certain that Laine will consistently be a 90+ point player because you know something I don't. If he's going to be a 70-80 point guy, then I don't see how they are in substantially different value tiers.
 
re:Clamshells
That's why I started off with 3 usable players to off set the loss of Stone, KC will most likely be the best of the bunch.
 
gholas said:
re:Clamshells
That's why I started off with 3 usable players to off set the loss of Stone, KC will most likely be the best of the bunch.
Click to expand...

I would say remove all 3 of the assets in your OP, and start again with some of the assets I named. Your "starting point" is not actually a reasonable starting point.

We don't want nickels and dimes for our loonie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom