you remember the Oake twitter follow controversy, right?What's way more important & overlooked I.M.O.
"what goes on at Scott Oake's hot tub parties "
you remember the Oake twitter follow controversy, right?What's way more important & overlooked I.M.O.
"what goes on at Scott Oake's hot tub parties "
100% this. Great post.I understand what he's saying.
And he's wrong.
"spouting a stat"? Oh man. Is that what we're going to call it when someone counts to five correctly?
That's not how any of this works. Not the least of which is that it is not a comparable amount of variance on either side. Like, obsessing about a sample size of five is ridiculous enough, but "sample size of five" plus ".. and I'll just remove whatever samples don't please me" is even crazier.
FACT: If the Jets are scored on first in the playoffs, they have a significantly higher than 0% chance to win the game.
FACT: when the Jets have been scored on first in this playoffs, they have won ALMOST EXACTLY AS OFTEN as statistically expected.
FACT: the 'plus luck' that the Jets enjoyed in winning that game they were scored on first is almost exactly identical to the sum of all the 'minus luck' that the Jets suffered in not winning those other four games they were scored on first. Do you know how we can tell that? Because the Jets were almost exactly on average for "measured comebacks versus expected comebacks" during that five game sample. If measured equals expected, the net sum of luck is zero.
FACT: Even if the Jets DID have a 0% chance of winning when being scored on first in this playoffs, their winning rate when THEY score first has been so high that, if maintained throughout a year, would make them a certain President's Trophy winner and the clear cut playoff favorite.
... this last one is really the biggest of them all -- even taking this flawed line of reasoning at face value, it still would have us as a championship caliber team.
What happened to Aavco?
Agree.I'd put Morrow in over Chiarot as well. The only reasons I'd move Enstrom to the bottom pairing is to give Myers some help moving the puck and to keep Morrow/Myers away from each other.
We seem to lose games when we stop skating. Gliding to pucks and waiting for them to come to us. We have to skate for 60 minutes if we want to beat Vegas. We stop skating and we might as well hand them the series.
Agreed. Watching the Jets waiting on pucks has been painful. Also want to see much quicker puck retrieval in our zone and quicker movement right up the ice.
This forum is so negative after a loss. God, will I ever learn to ignore HFB after Jets lose?
All the hysteria and negativity after a loss I suspect. We have a team that collected 114 pts, and 2 series wins but after a loss its all negative bull****.
This forum is so negative after a loss. God, will I ever learn to ignore HFB after Jets lose?
I come because I find it therapeutic knowing there are others out there like me. Seeing others ranting actually makes me feel better for some reason.
Agree.
Also, Buff and Morrow have actually been pretty good together.
______________________________________________________It is only a matter of time before Ehlers starts lighting the lamp.
He was so close with that backhand off the post.
I'm inclined to agree but we've been saying the same thing for what will be 15 games tomorrow. He needs to bear down and figure it out, as well as catch a bit of luck.It is only a matter of time before Ehlers starts lighting the lamp.
He was so close with that backhand off the post.