GDT: Jets @ Avs | 6pm MT | HEPPY NEW YEAR

RoyIsALegend

Gross Misconduct
Sponsor
Oct 24, 2008
25,495
41,689
Dominant night for the Toews-Makar pairing.

Rough one for Big Sam.

IMG_1823.jpeg
 

Metallo

NWOBHM forever \m/
Feb 14, 2010
19,487
16,499
Québec, QC
Dominant night for the Toews-Makar pairing.

Rough one for Big Sam.

View attachment 954324
Malinski looks like a guy running out of gas. The offense we saw last year is gone and he's less and less reliable defensively. Compound that with the fact that we already have a small defense and IMHO this guy should not be a starter for us in the playoffs.
 

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
27,049
11,346
Michigan
How was Parsnips in his first game?

Ok, definition of ok..

Made a dump in that didn't quite go all the way that they scored off of with a stretch pass during a change. We had guys back, they just got beat though. Not all on him, but needs to put more on it. Showed some ability to hang onto the puck and made a few good passes.

Got lit up early by the pilon Logan Stanley too.
 

dahrougem2

Registered User
Dec 9, 2011
40,135
45,841
Edmonton, Alberta
Dominant night for the Toews-Makar pairing.

Rough one for Big Sam.

View attachment 954324
I wonder if the Avs look at a game like this, see Middleton do relatively well against big boys while Malinski struggles and think they need to find a 3rd pairing RHD to replace him.
Malinski looks like a guy running out of gas. The offense we saw last year is gone and he's less and less reliable defensively. Compound that with the fact that we already have a small defense and IMHO this guy should not be a starter for us in the playoffs.
I don't know about out of gas. The offense isn't there like it was last season but IMO it's because he took the time to really focus on his defensive game this season, which is MUCH improved.

Now, I don't know if he's going to be here come playoff time because the Avs are small as it is but I don't think he's running out of gas.
Ok, definition of ok..

Made a dump in that didn't quite go all the way that they scored off of with a stretch pass during a change. We had guys back, they just got beat though. Not all on him, but needs to put more on it. Showed some ability to hang onto the puck and made a few good passes.

Got lit up early by the pilon Logan Stanley too.
He had a shift in the 3rd that I loved, threw three hits, big disruptor on the forecheck and causing havoc in the Jets zone.

If the Avs can find a way to get that out of him, even if he doesn't throw the hits, just be a major forecheck disruptor they could have something.
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
17,719
25,806
We just beat the division leader. Pretty happy about that. Shows that now with our improved goaltending, we are arguably the team to beat in the West. Not that impressed by Vegas.

Let's f***ing do this. While it's stretch, I wouldn't say even grabbing the division is impossible. I have confidence in this team.
 

GirardSpinorama

Registered User
Aug 20, 2004
21,923
10,899
Malinski really struggled. Still a good player overall but without being put in more offensive situations, his warts will just be obvious especially without a solid d partner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Murzu

RoyIsALegend

Gross Misconduct
Sponsor
Oct 24, 2008
25,495
41,689
We just beat the division leader. Pretty happy about that. Shows that now with our improved goaltending, we are arguably the team to beat in the West. Not that impressed by Vegas.

Let's f***ing do this. While it's stretch, I wouldn't say even grabbing the division is impossible. I have confidence in this team.

Don’t get too happy.

The Jets board said the schedule makers marked this as an Avs win, since they played us on the back half of a B2B.

They’ve already said the next game against us will be a loss as well, because… yep, the schedule makers are putting us against them on the back end of a B2B.
 

sethro109

🏒 🎮🏈🇺🇸🍻
Sponsor
May 3, 2011
30,307
36,221
Centennial, CO
Malinski really struggled. Still a good player overall but without being put in more offensive situations, his warts will just be obvious especially without a solid d partner.
He needs to battle more in front of the net. G gets pushed around there, but at least he's battling. Malinski is always looking to intercept the pass, but you can't always do that. Get in there and f*** some guys up, or at the very least, lift their sticks.
 
Last edited:

sethro109

🏒 🎮🏈🇺🇸🍻
Sponsor
May 3, 2011
30,307
36,221
Centennial, CO
Don’t get too happy.

The Jets board said the schedule makers marked this as an Avs win, since they played us on the back half of a B2B.

They’ve already said the next game against us will be a loss as well, because… yep, the schedule makers are putting us against them on the back end of a B2B.
For that back to back, they play LA in Winnipeg before they host us the next day also in Winnipeg. You would have to think we'd see Helly that game and not their backup.
 

Jazzguitar

Registered User
Feb 25, 2012
387
500
Denver
I wonder if the Avs look at a game like this, see Middleton do relatively well against big boys while Malinski struggles and think they need to find a 3rd pairing RHD to replace him.
I've really liked his game since he's been up. Keeps it simple, gets the puck out, even gets shots through to the net and brings some much needed size/physicality. I like him a lot more than the other three we've thrown in that spot. I'm not opposed to an upgrade there but just saying I think he's done surprisingly, as you put it relatively well.
 

AvBuff

Registered User
May 1, 2019
764
2,032
Don’t get too happy.

The Jets board said the schedule makers marked this as an Avs win, since they played us on the back half of a B2B.

They’ve already said the next game against us will be a loss as well, because… yep, the schedule makers are putting us against them on the back end of a B2B.

They can suck it. If any team has a beef with the NHL schedule makers, it's the Avs. Their November/December was a death march.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad