To anyone that wondered, I'm now on my computer where the ads are apparently not some dystopian "finish your post in sixty seconds or we'll nuke your reply, lol" horseshit, so I can address the post I was trying to reply to about "I wonder why 'cock' is uncensored"
Basically, it has to do with what words have completely benign homophones
Like recently, Hasbro demanded that the competitive Scrabble association make "bad words" illegal. In direct opposition to the spirit of the game and against the majority wishes of both the NSA and its members, but hey, when a multi-billion dollar corpo with a PR problem wants to clean up their image, that's what they do.
So for one example, they decided to ban the adjective "butch", as in, "of a woman, especially a lesbian, to present in a stereotypically masculine fashion". And of course, the superlative "butchest" was also banned. But what about the case where a woman has this quality to some comparative degree, just not a maximal one?
of course, they had to leave "butcher" in the game, because that could also spell a person who chops your meat for you, and in a game where the words are literally 100% decoupled from any meaning whatsoever (fun fact: one year, the French national Scrabble champ was a bored Welsh savant who didn't speak a word of French but decided to memorize the official French word list 'for a challenge'), you literally have no way to discern.
So yes, even words like "chink" (a dent) or "spade" (the highest ranking suit in a deck of cards) among many others, they sailed right through. And so it goes when you try and make up a static censorship list as forums try to do.
So instead you do the next best thing and staff them with people, but people are flawed. See which, the mod who somehow concluded "did Wayne Simmonds fulfill his speculated plan to kneel for the national anthem? My friend and I need to settle a bet" counted as me being a TOS-violating racist.
And you're goddamn right I'm never letting that one go, but that's another point.
Basically, we either have a choice: token-based matching with a shit-ton of false positives and negatives, or virtual hall-monitors with a shit-ton of false positives and negatives. And if it's any consolation, they both suck.
Also, uh, go Jets go, great job tonight. Just to keep things on topic