Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman: VII- Swayman's agent basically calls Cam a liar
- Thread starter smithformeragent
- Start date
UncleRico
Registered User
- May 8, 2017
- 9,165
- 11,905
Exactly my point why it would be easier for Neely to prove.
You guys realize these contracts are signed over docusign or something similar right? There’s an internet trail for all of these.
If there’s an offer it’s written and documented somewhere.
bearcountry17
Registered User
Does anyone think 8x8 for a guy like Swayman is "ruining the market" for goaltenders? I would say that's closer to setting the market as all the guys in the top 5 have some hardware to show for it.
Last edited:
Clint Eastwood
Eff the Habs
I'm gonna guess no announcement on a signing tonight.
khanomcat
Registered User
Been turning this over on and off all day. I think there are solid arguments to make on both the side of the player, and on the side of management. But I think it comes down to one thing, for me. I don’t want my team to end up like the Maple Leafs, where they seem to give players anything they ask, and are a perpetual failure come playoff time. Swayman asking for and getting the moon doesn’t sit well with me. So I have to side with management.
I love whodunnit and mystery stuff. This is great. My mind is immersed in numbers and formulas all day this is a great escape
AlpineLager
The way she *** goes
I just cant see Neely tossing that number out of his ass. Cannot be a complete fabrication, right? I beleive the guy has more integrity than that as a human being let alone business man.
Maybe it was $8/8yrs. Maybe they never said $64, maybe they just said 8. Then Gross is technically right, even though he’s actually a turd.
- Sep 25, 2023
- 650
- 695
BruinsFanMike82
Registered User
Just now from Friedman:
SO WHERE ARE WE?
Until Monday, this is where I believe everything stood:
• Neely said he directly asked Swayman if the goalie wished to be a Bruin, and the answer was a resounding yes. I’m under the impression Swayman has always pushed for maximum term. After initially offering contracts of various lengths, the Bruins were satisfied with Swayman’s response and focused on eight years.
• Despite that, the two sides remain so far apart on salary that this won’t be solved unless player or team completely caves in or changes their minds. I’ve heard some softening of positions, but the gap was millions per season to start with.
• Gross’s statement claims that, prior to the media conference, the Bruins never got to $64M. I think they were close, maybe around $60M-$62M. Swayman/Gross probably aren’t as annoyed about the number itself as they are about it being mentioned in the first place. I read what Neely said as this: “We’re going to 64 and no farther. That’s it.” We will see. David Pastrnak pushed the Bruins farther than they wanted to go, but he was unrestricted. Swayman saw that success, but he is restricted.
• Two weeks ago, I started to hear rumours of a possible trade. The Bruins wouldn’t comment, but it was clear they told teams they weren’t considering it and wanted to keep him. Again, we will see if anything has changed. Remember, other teams are allowed to speak to Swayman because he’s an unsigned free agent. They know what he wants.
...
We know Swayman wants to be a Bruin, albeit on his terms, and we’re not anywhere close to that. For the moment, however, money is secondary. During this pause, he must ask himself, “Can I move past the bitterness of this negotiation?”
If the answer is yes, he can be a Bruin. An excellent one. If the answer is no, he will flourish somewhere else.
www.sportsnet.ca
SO WHERE ARE WE?
Until Monday, this is where I believe everything stood:
• Neely said he directly asked Swayman if the goalie wished to be a Bruin, and the answer was a resounding yes. I’m under the impression Swayman has always pushed for maximum term. After initially offering contracts of various lengths, the Bruins were satisfied with Swayman’s response and focused on eight years.
• Despite that, the two sides remain so far apart on salary that this won’t be solved unless player or team completely caves in or changes their minds. I’ve heard some softening of positions, but the gap was millions per season to start with.
• Gross’s statement claims that, prior to the media conference, the Bruins never got to $64M. I think they were close, maybe around $60M-$62M. Swayman/Gross probably aren’t as annoyed about the number itself as they are about it being mentioned in the first place. I read what Neely said as this: “We’re going to 64 and no farther. That’s it.” We will see. David Pastrnak pushed the Bruins farther than they wanted to go, but he was unrestricted. Swayman saw that success, but he is restricted.
• Two weeks ago, I started to hear rumours of a possible trade. The Bruins wouldn’t comment, but it was clear they told teams they weren’t considering it and wanted to keep him. Again, we will see if anything has changed. Remember, other teams are allowed to speak to Swayman because he’s an unsigned free agent. They know what he wants.
...
We know Swayman wants to be a Bruin, albeit on his terms, and we’re not anywhere close to that. For the moment, however, money is secondary. During this pause, he must ask himself, “Can I move past the bitterness of this negotiation?”
If the answer is yes, he can be a Bruin. An excellent one. If the answer is no, he will flourish somewhere else.
What comes next in the Bruins, Swayman standoff?
Cam Neely and the Boston Bruins made headlines when he commented on the standoff between the team and Jeremy Swayman. Elliotte Friedman has some thoughts on where the two parties can go from here.
Number8
Registered User
- Oct 31, 2007
- 18,649
- 18,683
Stop it. Please just stop. No one is going to do this. No one. Not Gross, not Neely. It is not going to happen.
Using the old “it has to be a lie because otherwise they’d just show the offer if it was true. Why don't they?” argument is ridiculous.
RiverbottomChuck
Registered User
This guy only exists to stick it to hockey clubs and make his clients not play hockey.
UncleRico
Registered User
- May 8, 2017
- 9,165
- 11,905
It’s against the CBA so if Gross is intentionally not disclosing contracts offers like people here are claiming they did. Bruins should report him to the league.
Number8
Registered User
- Oct 31, 2007
- 18,649
- 18,683
I beg you to stop.
No one is going to file a complaint against the Bruins. No one is going to file a complaint against Gross.
This is about them having a nasty battle over a contract. Not who is f***ing lying and when. You think they going to table getting ready for the season and spend time gathering evidence and making filings with League or whoever else? Please. Stop.
Clint Eastwood
Eff the Habs
As a pro wrestling fan, I am craving for a tag team match playah!
Gross's stable is underwhelming at best. RIP Gaudreau, but other than Nylanders, it's JAG's. Krug unfortunately might never play again, but at his best, he wasn't a top 10 D-man.
No wonder he wants his client to cash in, it may lead to more high level clientele. More reasons not to trust him.
No wonder he wants his client to cash in, it may lead to more high level clientele. More reasons not to trust him.
UncleRico
Registered User
- May 8, 2017
- 9,165
- 11,905
No I don’t because as I said I don’t think anyone is lying I think it was a miscommunication and it’s absurd to this Gross would risk his license for swayman
However there’s a bunc u people calling Gross a liar. I’m saying to all the people rhat are claiming gross is lying to his client and withholding info, thag it’s easily verifiable if he is lying and the team should file a report if that’s the case.
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
LD Zeev Buium - University of Denver, NCAA (2024, 12th, MIN)- Latest: Kaners PPGs
-
Upcoming events
-
-
-
AL Wild Card Best of 3 - Game 1 - Detroit Tigers @ Houston AstrosWagers: 3Staked: $990.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-