Player Discussion Jeremy Swayman: VII - agreed to 8 x 8.25 aav

[smithformeragent]

One could make the argument that we're beating a dead horse here.

So be it. Discuss, if you so choose. We'll keep all the Swayman talk contained to this thread.

If you have nothing meaningful to contribute to the conversation, move along.

We will not have this devolve into thread hijacking and flaming of other posters.

@Gee Wally

We have numerous deletions and more in here. We know tension and emotions are high.
But you folks must simply stop taking personal shots at each. Stay to topic.

If not we will be left with no choice other than adding thread bans.

Click to read more...

 

[Kate08]

 

[nORRis8]

And now the big one....
Do I want to be known as the goalie who set the market, or would I rather go down in history as a (hopefully) Stanley cup winning goaltender

I don't think it's Swayman.
What clout does Swayman carry to do such a thing?
He's played 140 games.
Swayman is being used by his doink-off agent.
He's the one who clearly will benefit. Agents do not look for the best interests of teams.
Their bottomline is how they can coat their own pockets.

 

[Number8]

I think he does too. I also think Korpisalo plays the first few games of the season, plays well enough to not draw any attention to himself, then Swayman enters the fray and everybody gets pissy all over again because "Boston already has a starter"

We are all destined to argue all season

No, we’re not.

 

[NeelyDan]

 

[LiseL]

B's should have taken the two year option

I believe someone posted in one of the earlier threads it wasn't a possibility as they were up against the cap and a 2 year deal would've had a higher AAV than a one year. Then lots of debate that Sweeney screwed up the cap the year before (2022) with the bonus structure of Bergeron and another player (can't remember the name) which counted against last year's cap (2023) which caused the cap situation.

 

[Dwatson783]

Regardless of if 64 was or wasn't on the table it's in the public now. If that number works then Swayman or Gross just needs to tweet "Send it over". The message is that it hasn't been on the table which is more telling to me.

Don't care about who's a liar and who said what- Neely nor Gross is being measured against the how but rather the outcome. The how only matters if this leads to a negative outcome for the team (or in Gross's scenario, his client's result).

Should the Bruins have moved Ullmark prior to signing Sway? Coin flip. Would it make the start of this season better? Yes- but we'd end up with more cash tied up in net later in the year if we couldn't move him after. Sway doesn't have enough leverage regardless of Ullmark being moved. If he wants to sit, he sits.

If we're anywhere near that 8x8 number we're in more than fair territory (granted there are other terms of importance to work out). Paying for a goalie beyond that as I think other's have shown the analytics for, doesn't make sense. Trading him anytime soon also doesn't likely make sense unless someone wants to make a wild splash. If not, I'd just hold off and wait. That sucks, but that's the name of the game.

 

[PB37]

View attachment 911802

It's a huge deal.

 

[BigGoalBrad]

What does Sway has in common with Jarvis, Raymond, Seider, Guenther, Faber, Beniers? He is young and wants to paid for his prime years and like those players really hasn't won anything. These players got paid for their future services. Swayman is already one of the better goalies in the league with the potential to become one of the top 5. I don't have a problem to pay him for the value of his prime years. If this means he would be overpaid by 1-2 million in the first years of his contract, so let it be.

But is he if he’s on any other team. The bruins make everyone look good in goal. Put him on Ottawa and let’s see what people say. Also if any team can continue the trend of winning with a mid level guy it’s us.

I’ve really soured on this dude as a person. Kind of want to just ruin his career and sit him for 2 years. He can go up to Orono and get an MBA and figure out how to earn it back.

 

[SwayHeyKid]

He also said Swayman asked for 8x9.5. Can you justify that ask?

Me, no, I would never give someone their original ask because I know they don't expect that. My number the whole time is 8.5 per. I would go 9 if I had to, not going to spite myself.

 

[PB37]

And you're not making assumptions?

Gross said that was never offered. The Bruins front office now says no comment. Why the crickets? Guessing Neely didn't read the pages in the Loretta Lynch report about not telling the truth going forward? Hmmm

Best part is If Gross says the Bruins have 64 million reasons to have Swayman on their roster right now and they said no, they never came down to there you would be leading the Gross is a liar charge.

Big swing and a miss there.

 

[Nothingbutglass]

Me, no, I would never give someone their original ask because I know they don't expect that. My number the whole time is 8.5 per. I would go 9 if I had to, not going to spite myself.

Its off the table now. 8x8 is final offer and is extremely fair. Whats your next step? Sit out?

 

[Number8]

Oh no I should have clarified.

I don’t know what to believe for dollar figures on the table.

I fully believe the multiple reports that $64 million wasn’t on the table and that Neely lied.

I wonder where those reports that $64M was not on the table before presser came from?

I don’t know myself what was offered and when. Why? Because I’m not one of the two or three people who is negotiating.

Good thing those reporters have been on all the calls so far. I’d hate for them to be simply relying on team or agent for this info.

 

[Guelph Bruin]

4 year deal is the answer and has always been the answer....but not for $8M per

 

[Dr Quincy]

Have they set a deadline for a response from Swayman's camp on the 64 mil? It's a little daunting trying to read back through 1900+ posts.

I don't know. Did Cam also shout out how the pay would be structured in each year? You know, there's a reason why contracts on paper and why snide flippant remarks at self-serving press conferences aren't considered binding offers.

But I'm not shocked Neely doesn't know that.

 

[SwayHeyKid]

It's a huge deal.

I thought old comps like Rask weren't allowed? Are we changing the rules now? Rask got max at 7 mil per 10 years ago....comes out to 9.5 per max now with the same percent

See easy.

Big swing and a miss there.

Ok

 

[PB37]

I will be shocked if the Bruins sign him for more than that 8x8. That line has been drawn and I think it only goes down from here not up.

The press conference definitely felt like a take or leave it cannon shot.

 

[TCB]

EF said 7.5. I did get out my abacus out and still couldn’t get either to 64 mil

I’m sure it was 7.5 though because Neely ain’t gonna flex on 200k more per year

https://x.com/i/web/status/1841605878492876958

 

[Coach Parker]

Look at what this process has done to our own fanbase. Can you imagine the dressing room, front office, agents' office and the Swayman family/friends? What a mess.

 

[SwayHeyKid]

Its off the table now. 8x8 is final offer and is extremely fair. Whats your next step? Sit out?

Who said it's the final offer?

 

[Mione134]

https://x.com/i/web/status/1841605878492876958

Gross is advising his client wrongly here.

Wake up, Jeremy.

 

[SwayHeyKid]

https://x.com/i/web/status/1841605878492876958

Yes I know. the 8x8 started two days ago

 

[Nothingbutglass]

Who said it's the final offer?

No one. The point is what can Swayman do if it is? If he is starting at $9.5, he's not in the real world of player value. No sense negotiating more. Put the final offer out and he has x amount of time to sign it. Otherwise, we give you permission to seek a trade or sit out.

 

[PB37]

I thought old comps like Rask weren't allowed? Are we changing the rules now? Rask got max at 7 mil per 10 years ago....comes out to 9.5 per max now with the same percent

See easy.


Ok

You don't think getting the 7th biggest goalie contract in history is a big deal?

 

[LiseL]

I've often wondered what Linus thinks of this situation. I'm sure if asked he would say he's too busy prepping for the upcoming season to pay attention. However, he & Swayman were like brothers and I don't think Linus really wanted to leave Boston.

Maybe Sweeney should have figured out a way to keep both. I know a lot of people were saying it would be bad asset management to tie up so much money in 2 goaltenders but look at the shit the Bruins are in now.

I read somewhere that both Ullmark and Swayman wanted to be the starter so one of them had to go: they chose Swayman. I also remember that during one of Ullmark's interviews after being traded, he said he was looking forward to be a starter and playing in the playoffs. Granted, no guarantees with Ottawa for playoffs, but he will defintely be the starter.

But you're right, Sweeney didn't have to trade him, could've waited till the trade deadline or just let him walk next year. I guess it all depends on how much you value a 1st round pick. I also think management never saw this coming, otherwise, they might've done things differently.

 

[shelbysdad]

What an awful situation this has turned out to be....I bought 4 of Swayman's rookie cards last season

I bought the autographed picture from the pro shop.....any offers ?