Over the volcano
Registered User
After winning a few Cups and 30 years before the salary cap? i mean, ok.Right. Boston hated Sanderson and Cheevers, those guys weren't loved at all.
Last edited:
After winning a few Cups and 30 years before the salary cap? i mean, ok.Right. Boston hated Sanderson and Cheevers, those guys weren't loved at all.
This is one of the many bits of revisionist history from the Thornton trade that management (Sinden and MOC) have always sold. There was no cap when Thornton was dealt, the return was awful because O'Connell never should have been GM and was horribly out of his league.
Signing Chara and Savard had nothing to do with Thornton, it had to do with a half empty building, declining interest in the team and beer sales struggling.
This comes with a caveat. A good businessman knows how to be fair, typically playing the long game... small wins on each transaction add up, and without any animosity, it helps for future deals.
If Im a GM picking in the top 10, Ill be avoiding whichever player has Gross as his agent.. this could be very costly for players to consider him..
The big danger right now is an offer sheet that a team might offer Swayman that can cripple the Bruins' long-term plans.Yes there are limits. Equally if an agent has a habit of encouraging their clients into decisions and deals that end up hurting their careers long term, that's a problem. But I think an agent's rep and conduct would have to be pretty extreme before a GM would start turning down players simply because of who represents them.
End of the day, Sway is a grown man, and how this resolves is up to him. The agent can conduct the process, use their tactics, but the negotiating terms and final decision are ultimately up to the player. Clearly Sway has something in mind and so far the Bruins haven't met him at a spot that's agreeable to him. Sooner or later something will give, from one side or both. Gross may create a few more waves in the meantime, but I don't think it will change the final outcome.
Wish he would've held firm and not budged when OTT insisted on taking $3m of Korpisalo's contract for 4 years.Don sweeney holding firm and not budging. Love it
I’m curious to see what it’d look like with Bussi and Korpisalo.
Goes both ways. If I'm an RFA and a GM uses a clearly ridiculous player comparison against me in arbitration, a comparison that eveyrone knows s BS, just to save 1m, while blowing $$ on buyouts of terrible contracts he signed himself, then I'm going to get the heck out of dodge the 2nd I can, and use everything within the CBA to expediate that.This comes with a caveat. A good businessman knows how to be fair, typically playing the long game... small wins on each transaction add up, and without any animosity, it helps for future deals.
If Im a GM picking in the top 10, Ill be avoiding whichever player has Gross as his agent.. this could be very costly for players to consider him..
What teams have the picks, the cap space, and need a goalie?The big danger right now is an offer sheet that a team might offer Swayman that can cripple the Bruins' long-term plans.
Calgary, Utah and San Jose. Utah should be all in. If they ever found a taker for Weber they could blow the doors off, as of now could go 9 mil per, maybe more if they move a goalie.What teams have the picks, the cap space, and need a goalie?
Right.I’m curious as well but I’d be completely fine with never finding out haha
Right.
Having grown up watching the revolving door of coaches and goalies in the 90s, I’ve seen what that can look like.
But you wonder if there’s something to this “Goalie Bob can get the best out of flotsam and jetsam”.
Say they match any offer to 9mil. That would put the compensation at two firsts, a second and a third.Calgary, Utah and San Jose. Utah should be all in. If they ever found a taker for Weber they could blow the doors off, as of now could go 9 mil per, maybe more if they move a goalie.
I would try to work out a different deal with them if they didn’t want him. 1, goalie and guenther is what I would want not to match. I would def match it and keep him if it was up to meSay they match any offer to 9mil. That would put the compensation at two firsts, a second and a third.
All that plus 9mil in cap space vs Swayman, what would you do if you were Sweeney?
Think I might take the Utah picks (should be good ones) and use the dough on the roster.
Bob has been here since 2003. Since then we've changed GMs multiple times, but have gotten - Calder Raycroft, Rask, Timmy, Ullmark and now Sway. They've also had a bunch of backups come in and play rock solid and then look not as good elsewhere.Right.
Having grown up watching the revolving door of coaches and goalies in the 90s, I’ve seen what that can look like.
But you wonder if there’s something to this “Goalie Bob can get the best out of flotsam and jetsam”.
The big danger right now is an offer sheet that a team might offer Swayman that can cripple the Bruins' long-term plans.
Halak on other teams, MTL .919 2.62, STL .916 2.23, NYI .913 2.66------BOS .918 2.40Bob has been here since 2003. Since then we've changed GMs multiple times, but have gotten - Calder Raycroft, Rask, Timmy, Ullmark and now Sway. They've also had a bunch of backups come in and play rock solid and then look not as good elsewhere.
Now, either the Bruins are top notch at identifying these guys, which may very well be true, but he's been the one common denominator since. Makes you wonder for sure