Unbiased Fan
Registered User
- May 24, 2019
- 3,798
- 1,802
I wouldn’t do Skinner and Power for Tavares. 9 mil of dead cap for a useless player is disgusting for 2 years.
I wouldn’t do Skinner and Power for Tavares. 9 mil of dead cap for a useless player is disgusting for 2 years.
"Unbiased Fan"I wouldn’t do Skinner and Power for Tavares. 9 mil of dead cap for a useless player is disgusting for 2 years.
To Buffalo:
John Tavares
3x pairs of bedsheets
To Toronto:
Jeff Skinner
Infinite smart water
Both have NMCs, but Skinner would seemingly be ok with Toronto and Tavares might be tired of being one of the scapegoats. He can create a narrative of redemption, or could just fully embrace non-relevance in Buffalo. Maybe Skinner would pop off in a better offense and wouldn’t require a buyout.
It’s so crazy it just might work. Or I just think it’d be hilarious, maybe both. Thoughts?
The other problem is that JT is a much better overall player than Skinner so it ain't happening.I'm not against it, of course, but the problem is that Skinner has three years left on his contract, and Tavares has one year left.
That would be a very interesting trade and the biggest value is the 50% retained.I’ll play along as I’m bored.
To Toronto:
Skinner @ 50%
11 OA
2025 1st
Girgensons UFA rights
To Buffalo
Marner
It’s all in fun, but this is much closer than the original proposal of a swap for JT.
I’d say the biggest value piece in that deal is Marner - and I couldn’t see BUF touching it without an extension. But I hear what you’re saying - Skinner at 50 all the sudden isn’t bad value.That would be a very interesting trade and the biggest value is the 50% retained.
Girgensons really has zero value and might have a hard time landing a job in the NHL next season.
Obviously but I was thinking from the Leafs angle and should have stated as such.I’d say the biggest value piece in that deal is Marner - and I couldn’t see BUF touching it without an extension. But I hear what you’re saying - Skinner at 50 all the sudden isn’t bad value.
I used to like him but he is 30 time passes and teams and the NHL moves on.I always liked Girgensons! A guy I played pickup with got his white rookie year jersey and would wear it when on team white. Maybe I’ve got a soft spot for him.
I’ll play along as I’m bored.
To Toronto:
Skinner @ 50%
11 OA
2025 1st
Girgensons UFA rights
To Buffalo
Marner
It’s all in fun, but this is much closer than the original proposal of a swap for JT.
Oh okay....Buffalo would have to pay 2 1sts and 2 3rds to take on Skinner’s extra 2 years.
With skinner 9 million of dead cap in the AHL that will take the leafs out of contention even with Power running the 2nd pair behind Rielly, Mathews will 99% pull a Lindros and not play until he’s traded. I’m a huge leafs fan but if the leafs acquired Skinners cap hit I’d bet every cent in my account that Mathews sits out no matter how massive the ammount of futures attached to him.LOL. Leafs don't need a #1 d man all of 21 and from Toronto. Toronto would do this in a heartbeat and probably play Skinner one year and then LTIR him. Let's be honest.
I’ll play along as I’m bored.
To Toronto:
Skinner @ 50%
11 OA
2025 1st
Girgensons UFA rights
To Buffalo
Marner
It’s all in fun, but this is much closer than the original proposal of a swap for JT.
Keep the water and add 1lb of Buffalo wings. We have enough tootie-fruit water in Toronto.Ok, not sure why you’re just ignoring the fact that Jeff Skinner comes with infinite smart water. Sure, there’s costs in distribution, but the product itself is free. That’s the biggest part of the deal, and we both know it.
Srsly though, no interest in Marner. Dunno how Toronto would make Skinner happen, I actually like him in Buffalo though. If we’re gonna suck he makes it entertaining at least.
Marleau was 40 Skinner isn't dead yet so the comparison is terrible.Leafs had to pay a 1st to dump Marleau for one year. And he only made 6 million.
Skinner has 2 additional years at 9million.
Girgensons will be the next Sabre to win a cup with some other team doesn't help that the Sabres fans love to jet decent players for their roles and pretend like they are problems.That would be a very interesting trade and the biggest value is the 50% retained.
Girgensons really has zero value and might have a hard time landing a job in the NHL next season.