Empoleon8771
Registered User
Both the eye test and analytics back up that Walman is better.
Based on what Wings fans are saying in here about Petry, I'm not trusting their eye test on any sort of evaluation.
Walman has a grand total of 1 season of being a regular defenseman above a #6 role. I'm not buying for a second that Walman is better than a #3 defenseman (which is what Petry is) based on a 63 game sample size.
If Petry isn't washed or overpaid. Keep him. That simple. Stop firing up threads trying to pawn him off on the Wings. That ship sailed more than 8 years ago.
"Stop firing up threads trying to pawn him off"
There has been a grand total of 2 threads made on the trade board about Petry in the last 9 months. One was this one and one stemmed from a debate on the Penguins board about what his value would look like.
Again, just say "no thanks, Petry is too old and too expensive for what we want". If Wings fans wouldn't be making absolutely stupid statements in this thread, no Penguins fan would be disagreeing.