Gaylord Q Tinkledink
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2018
- 33,512
- 36,740
Again, I guess pointing out something that should be obvious needs to be done.Then don’t keep him, why are we helping Petry and Detroit? They get the best player for a 2.4m caphit and we get nothing for the 2.4m caphit for 2 years. Some can’t seem to separate the Hoffman trade from the Petry trade. Petry was ours, there was no need to give him away and retain space. It was a bad deal, Hughes was being a nice guy and nice guys finish last.
Ppl thinking because he was nice to Petry that it’s going to attract other UFA’s, yeah ok. Naive bunch.
Kevin Hayes, big, but soft dman who put up over 50 points went for less than what Petry did, despite having an extra year.
Ryan Johansen, who's comparable to Petry was retained at 50% and basically went for nothing.
Brent Burns, who's waaaaaaay better than Petry barely went for more than Petrt despite being better, having more term and have more money retained.
Filip Zadina was bought out because no one wanted him on his contract for free.
It's the way the NHL is and the fact that people don't see this is kind of sad.
Well, we could have kept Petry
Why ? Potentially have him play worse and be even worth less ? Have him take away ice time from Harris, Guhle, or Xhekaj ? Is this time going to be competing next season ? Nah, they still feel the team is going to miss the playoffs and keeping Petry, who wanted to be in the states and only reason he didnt have the Habs on his No Trade list was because he didn't think the Habs would acquire him.
Let's not forget that the Habs got a 2nd for the extra year on Petry compared to Hoffman and the 700ishk difference between DeSmith and Pitlick.