eco's bones
Registered User
he was brought in as a faceoff specialist-- not a pk specialist(or to add scoring as some others have suggested). that's why he was here. faceoffs. both ottawa(konopka?) and washington(halpern) had faceoff specialists that destroyed us. i'm sure it's the same reason montreal picked him up.
he was fine on the pk, and defensively-- but the reason he was here was to take important draws. if we had our 3rd line scoring goals, he might still be here for that reason, but we don't so he is forced to move on.
i'm also fine to see him go, but he filled his role as good as could've been expected.
boyle's has more upside outside of draws, so as long as boyle drops to the 4th i'm extremely content with losing halpern, even if there's no return, it opens our options up for kids.
Players are brought in to help the team win--and in any way they can. They're not just brought in to take face-offs and that's it. And neither Ottawa nor Washington destroyed us--both those teams lost their series to us. You've described one dimension of his game overriding the rest of his contribution and that's okay for you--well Derek Booggard, Colton Orr and John Scott get slagged (and rightly so) for being only one dimensional as well.