KrisLeturnover
Registered User
- Jan 17, 2021
- 268
- 269
UFA next summer who may very well opt to test free agency. If the Pens try to get some return before then, what kind of value are we looking at?
I’d be ok if he stopped in Edmonton for a year before continuing to the ocean. What’s the price w/ 50% retention?I hate thay guy. I hope he goes out west and keeps going when he reaches the ocean.
lol.. Pens aren't retaining on his 6 mil cap hit dudeI’d be ok if he stopped in Edmonton for a year before continuing to the ocean. What’s the price w/ 50% retention?
lol…. He’s only got one year left on his contract dude.lol.. Pens aren't retaining on his 6 mil cap hit dude
lol…. He’s only got one year left on his contract dude.
Seriously, IF (big if) the Pens were shopping Guentzel, I can only assume it would be with the strategy of a re-tool/rebuild, at which point absorbing cap is moot.
Do I think they’re actually shopping him? No.
Would the Oil have the right pieces to acquire him? Not sure.
Would the Pens be dumb to not maximize Guentzel’s value by retaining 50% for one year if they went the re-tool route? Yes.
Rebuilding teams do it all the time (retention). I’m sure they’d have no issue trading him without retention, but if you can gain an extra 2nd for eating 3 mil, why wouldn’t you?
Fair enough. We can retain 4% just like Nashville didlol…. He’s only got one year left on his contract dude.
Seriously, IF (big if) the Pens were shopping Guentzel, I can only assume it would be with the strategy of a re-tool/rebuild, at which point absorbing cap is moot.
Do I think they’re actually shopping him? No.
Would the Oil have the right pieces to acquire him? Not sure.
Would the Pens be dumb to not maximize Guentzel’s value by retaining 50% for one year if they went the re-tool route? Yes.
Rebuilding teams do it all the time (retention). I’m sure they’d have no issue trading him without retention, but if you can gain an extra 2nd for eating 3 mil, why wouldn’t you?
Fair enough. We can retain 4% just like Nashville did
All seriousness though, I think you'll be hard-pressed to find a better value for a scoring winger in the entire NHL (i guess Adrian Kempe). Guentzel has been scoring at a 40 goal clip for 5 seasons straight. If Guentzel goes, I would seriously doubt any holdup to the trade will be the cap hit.
Speaking of which, if I was a betting man I'd bet EDM is on Jake's 12-team no trade clause.
Also, you've kind of disregarded the Pens cap situation in this whole thinking process, but let's not even go there. We're also still at least 2 years away from a full rebuild. If Jake gets traded it's a hockey trade and to maximize value on him.
A king ransom us a 1st and prospect maybe? He's a free agent and teams will treat him like rental. Alot of teams are in cap trouble and if he doesn't play RW or two way game, alot of teams now adays are wary of just a scorer like Jake, fiala, boeser who don't have two way gamesHe'd fetch a ransom without retention. I think that was his point - alongside it being super cheap.
Why the hell would we retain when we're trying to remain competitive - on a contract that in no world requires retention. We might include a cap dump alongside to take a lesser return (Granlund).
- .9 ppg over his career including .43 gpg
- most impressive is that he's ppg in the playoffs. 58p / 58 games including 34 goals.
At 6M, even with 1 year left he's got just about every team in the league calling.
A king ransom us a 1st and prospect maybe? He's a free agent and teams will treat him like rental. Alot of teams are in cap trouble and if he doesn't play RW or two way game, alot of teams now adays are wary of just a scorer like Jake, fiala, boeser who don't have two way games
If Guentzel is the cost to get Gibson, I don't want Gibson.He really makes little sense to trade unless you're getting Saros/Gibson [I remember Jake liking Nashville so could see him signing long term there] or last years' fan target of Tkachuk but that ships' sailed.
I'd really hate to use him to dump Granlund but if you could deal Jake + Granlund with no salary coming back you then what...go after DeBrincat? Not sure what exactly that does for the Pens overall...maybe a slight positive bump since Granlund is about 2-2.5M overpaid.
Lol, what? One of these guys sticks out like a sore thumb. Really though it's 3 tiers of wingers.A king ransom us a 1st and prospect maybe? He's a free agent and teams will treat him like rental. Alot of teams are in cap trouble and if he doesn't play RW or two way game, alot of teams now adays are wary of just a scorer like Jake, fiala, boeser who don't have two way games
Until they age out with this core group of Crosby, Malkin and Letang, it doesn't seem like they want to rebuild yet. A lot can change since upper management just got cashiered, of course. It's not completely clear what Fenway wants to do. Yet the working theory seems to be that they want to retool and compete while Crosby is there - which means turning the money that they get from moving some players into new players, not dead cap space.lol…. He’s only got one year left on his contract dude.
Seriously, IF (big if) the Pens were shopping Guentzel, I can only assume it would be with the strategy of a re-tool/rebuild, at which point absorbing cap is moot.
Do I think they’re actually shopping him? No.
Would the Oil have the right pieces to acquire him? Not sure.
Would the Pens be dumb to not maximize Guentzel’s value by retaining 50% for one year if they went the re-tool route? Yes.
Rebuilding teams do it all the time (retention). I’m sure they’d have no issue trading him without retention, but if you can gain an extra 2nd for eating 3 mil, why wouldn’t you?
A king ransom us a 1st and prospect maybe? He's a free agent and teams will treat him like rental. Alot of teams are in cap trouble and if he doesn't play RW or two way game, alot of teams now adays are wary of just a scorer like Jake, fiala, boeser who don't have two way games
He's a rental. Are you forgetting that?Jake Guentzel would return a huge amount if the Penguins put him on the market. He's not comparable to those two players and has proven he is one of the best goal scorers in the playoffs over his career.
Any contender would be begging for him. Especially if PIT retains 50%.
I am literally trying to say even at 6mil, teams still have to move money. There's a reason cap strapped teams like Minnesota doesn't pay 1st or 2nd for rentals. They moved fiala because they didn't want to have to move multiple pieces off roster to keep fialaIf he had 3 suitors then yeah, sure - and we'd pick the best 1st or best prospect or both. At 6M he's exactly the player teams want in a cash strapped league - not the other way around. With a 12 team no-go, that leaves 20 teams to bid on him. How you could think the end result is only a 1st round pick - maybe prospect in a 20 team discussion is beyond me but hey - I'd eat crow.
Also lol...20 goal Boeser...who costs MORE...is your comparable. Cmon now.
He's a rental. Are you forgetting that?
Some of you guys needs to take a Month offUFA next summer who may very well opt to test free agency. If the Pens try to get some return before then, what kind of value are we looking at?
I’d rather take 4 1sts for Guzentzel at 50% retained then 2 without.Who on the Penguins is going to score goals against the Rangers if they trade Guenztel?
Any team looking for a complementary winger to play with their stars should be interested in him.
You give up 4 firsts for Guentzel you're going to be selling cars by the end of the year.I’d rather take 4 1sts for Guzentzel at 50% retained then 2 without.
Same as Penguins did last month.Some of you guys needs to take a Month off
I was making a point that retaining would probably quadruple his value.You give up 4 firsts for Guentzel you're going to be selling cars by the end of the year.