montreal
Go Habs Go
Somehow, I doubt he would have been this good had we signed him after 2 years and played him under Lefebvre.
Development is important. His progress under Bouchard the last two years has been phenomenal.
for sure as we have seen just about every prospect from Evans to Brook to Poehling to Pezzetta even, all have shown a good deal of progress over time while with Bouchard. Who can we say that about under Lefebvre over 6 years.
Sly was a horrible coach but he also had crap to develop. Bouchard would have not been able to develop Hudon, Ghetto, McCarron, DLR either.
Development is facilitating a good environment. Only 8 top 100 picks from 08-11 draft years are to be blamed for many of our problems. Don't confuse this statement with me saying Sly was a good coach. He just was not a good coach on a team that the GM had to sign players to fill vs inserting good prospects like we have at the moment.
Creating a winning culture took years to get over from the ripple effects of bad drafting and weak draft power from 08-15. Realty
Evans developed well in the NCAA as well. It's not all Bouchard. Bouchard's job is to facilitate the road and monitor the progress. Having better players to work with helps the overall strategy and I'm sure Bouchard will tell you this
This is where people get this wrong imo. Hockey coaches should make hockey players play better over time. I don't care if you have a team full of McCarron's, it's not about turning them into Cam Neely since that would never happen with the greatest development. It's about having the players improve and progress no matter where their talent level is at.
Lefebvre had some of the best players in the AHL in Terry, Hudon, yet his teams looked terrible on the ice. No structure, then you watch Bouchard's teams and it's clear as day, no matter the injuries, call ups, his teams play such an impressive structured game. They know where to be and what to do, they almost always play solid hockey in all 3 zones night after night.