Player Discussion Jake DeBrusk

Nuckles

_________
Apr 27, 2010
28,940
5,396
heck
I feel like a lot of people didn't get the memo from Bruins fans that DeBrusk is an extremely streaky player. Also he has a history of starting off the season very slowly in terms of scoring goals.

It probably doesn't help that he's adjusting to a new team and got moved around a few lines already.
 

Bleach Clean

Registered User
Aug 9, 2006
27,473
7,178
He's pretty much been as advertised coming over from Boston. I don't think the contract is terrible, but if you think he'll outperform it you need to see more out of Pettersson, or maybe move him up with Miller.

He's just not a guy who is going to drive a line without higher-level play from the centre.


A reasonable take, but I'll go a step further: If this is his floor, this contract will be one of the best on the team. No question in my mind about it.

I didn't get around to posting when Dom's model already had him as one of the best value contracts (if not the best iirc), confirming some of my early bias here. But the trepidation over it was excessive hyperbole... And I say this with him not even scoring a goal yet.

Once he gets more selfish and starts to mimic his 2.2~ shots per game rate, the conversation will shift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bh53

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,765
16,268
Debrusk was signed specifically to be a scoring winger for Elias Pettersson. So far Pettersson has one goal and Debrusk 0. One measly goal for an expenditure of $15m in annual salary is just plain ugly.

Hard to say whether Petey is dragging Debrusk down right now, or visa-versa.
 

Quinning

Registered User
Mar 18, 2008
26,969
14,517
They have negative chemistry with each other. They're actually making each other worse out there. Couldn't have more dissimilar styles of play.
 

Tinhorn1

Registered User
Aug 7, 2007
1,162
445
They have negative chemistry with each other. They're actually making each other worse out there. Couldn't have more dissimilar styles of play.
Agree with that, although when they started together they also set each other up for some grade A chances that they just missed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kanucks25

Quinning

Registered User
Mar 18, 2008
26,969
14,517
Agree with that, although when they started together they also set each other up for some grade A chances that they just missed.

DeBrusk should be with Miller and Boeser. I could see that line actually doing well with Miller as the play driver.

I would also look at putting Pettersson with Joshua and Garland. We know those two have chemistry. Joshua can keep teams from taking liberties with Pettersson (honestly, Garland can as well based on his fight the other night).
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,765
16,268
Beginning to see why the Bruins didn't make much of an effort to bring back Debrusk. With so many holes in the lineup, you'd expect someone with his experience and pay-grade to be one of the better Canucks on the ice tonight.

But other than a brief flurry in the third period, you'd have to check the program to confirm he even played. But Zadorov and Lindholm aren't doing much for the Bruins either.

So the UFA swap of Lindholm and Zadorov for Debrusk, Heinen and Forbort looks to be a dud for both teams.
 
Last edited:

LordBacon

CEO of sh*tposting
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2017
9,272
12,171
Hong Kong
Jake DeBust.

Jokes aside, theres no reason he cant pick it up later on.
The performance so far has been lackluster though, thats for sure.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad