SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 14,917
- 14,108
Bertuzzi. DeBrusk isn't even very good. His new contract is going to age like milk.
There's a lot more Canucks fans than there are Hawks fans on HF.Debrusk is winning this poll in a landslide. But I agree I'd take Bertuzzi
They seem pretty similar to me in terms of how they play and what they're good at, so I think you can base an opinion of who's better on who has better production.
DeBrusk:
View attachment 896233
Per 82:
Goals: 24
Assists: 23
Points: 47
Bertuzzi:
View attachment 896234
Per 82:
Goals: 23
Assists: 30
Points: 53
They have similar PP outputs for their careers. Bertuzzi has averaged six more points per 82 games but has also averaged more than one more minute in ice time per game. Both have missed considerable time due to injuries.
I lean toward Bert... but there can't be much of a difference either way.
I’m an Oilers fan who voted Debrusk. His defensive game makes it a clear winnerThere's a lot more Canucks fans than there are Hawks fans on HF.
Hockeying, obviously. These guy are hockeyers, so who hockeys better?"Better"?
Well Debrusk is the 1,817,111th most common name and Bertuzzi is the 57,918th most common name.
Bertuzzi also comes before Debrusk alphabetically.
They are both LW's so that is a draw...
Debrusk has more teeth than Bertuzzi.
It is really close based on those metrics.
Is there something specific you would like to concentrate on when analyzing who is better?
(I am just having fun with this response of course..,maybe let us know what you define "better" as?
I like debrusk character better, so him