Value of: Jake Allen to EDM

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

KrisLetAngry

MrJukeBoy
Dec 20, 2013
18,921
5,162
Saskatchewan
I mean to be fair what 1A starters are there available that Edmonton can afford.

There is Barrie but that is not what people trade for. They get there own UFA D.

So it's Barrie + a goalie.

Where's the value for the 1A starter.

Maybe you could get Price however that's if he wants to Leave Montreal and who knows.

Maybe get a goalie from Dallas? Maybe Holtby could be pried? Does Dallas do that though? Like bring back Khudobin to the NHL he looked good number wise in the AHL after the poor NHL start.
 

Funk21

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,386
1,894
Toronto
Why would the Oilers do this? They need a 1A starter. Jake Allen isn't that.

Because Jake Allen is way better than Kosk. Ideally you go after MAF, get Chicago to eat half and ask them to take Kosk.

The issue is that one year potential run will cost you a first plus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Halifax

Kaen

Registered User
Dec 29, 2009
1,625
681
Is Allen really enough of an upgrade to justify the return that the Habs would likely want in return? Especially since they would need to take salary back in return. The Oilers have spent the last decade+ finding bargain goalies and while it works on occasion(Talbot's good year, Smith last year), it has usually bit them in the ass. I think they need to shell out the pieces necessary to return a quality goalie, even if it ends up as an overpayment.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,407
13,890
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
Is Allen really enough of an upgrade to justify the return that the Habs would likely want in return? Especially since they would need to take salary back in return. The Oilers have spent the last decade+ finding bargain goalies and while it works on occasion(Talbot's good year, Smith last year), it has usually bit them in the ass. I think they need to shell out the pieces necessary to return a quality goalie, even if it ends up as an overpayment.
Allen keeps Edmonton in goalie purgatory. He is 100% the wrong solution.
 

A1LeafNation

Good, is simply not good enough!
Oct 17, 2010
27,649
17,719
Korpisalo Fleury Khudobin

All guys with less term or less cap hit.

Why Allen?
 

Anomie2029

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
3,906
4,128
Melbourne, Australia
Because Jake Allen is way better than Kosk. Ideally you go after MAF, get Chicago to eat half and ask them to take Kosk.

The issue is that one year potential run will cost you a first plus.

So how many firsts and prospects are the Oilers adding to make that deal? No way Hawks will retain, take salary, and lose the best player without significant add from Oilers.
 

RC51

Registered User
Dec 10, 2005
4,940
799
mtl
how about, I want the nhl best goalie and I want him for free 100% retained. SO go ahead, NAME ONE?
 

Funk21

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,386
1,894
Toronto
So how many firsts and prospects are the Oilers adding to make that deal? No way Hawks will retain, take salary, and lose the best player without significant add from Oilers.

Chicago needs to recoup a first for MAF as they have traded theirs away, nobody can afford him at 7 per that is a SC contender. If he had term then sure it would be a lot more but a first plus a middle round pick is what I would suspect. Goalies very rarely get you a first even one as accomplished as MAF. Plus he is certainly on the back nine of his career.
 

ManofSteel55

Registered User
Aug 15, 2013
33,407
13,890
Sylvan Lake, Alberta
So how many firsts and prospects are the Oilers adding to make that deal? No way Hawks will retain, take salary, and lose the best player without significant add from Oilers.
Probably one first would do it. Chicago will trade him if he is okay with it, and there will be few teams out there who are able to take on MAF's cap hit. Without retention, we saw his value over the summer. With retention, to a team in need of a goalie at the deadline, a 1st is a huge win for Chicago. Koskinen and a 1st for MAF at 50% is possible because its Holland and he likes veterans. Nobody else will offer a 1st.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TFHockey

glenbuis

Registered User
Sep 17, 2012
4,761
896
Probably one first would do it. Chicago will trade him if he is okay with it, and there will be few teams out there who are able to take on MAF's cap hit. Without retention, we saw his value over the summer. With retention, to a team in need of a goalie at the deadline, a 1st is a huge win for Chicago. Koskinen and a 1st for MAF at 50% is possible because its Holland and he likes veterans. Nobody else will offer a 1st.
seems like the worst part of it for the oilers is their increasing desperation. fleury at 50% plus taking on koskinen will be more costly than a first
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad