Peter Griffin
Registered User
That website has posted made up proposals from this site in the past as speculation. It’s garbage.The "rumour" doesnt have any sources, so it's just stuff they made up.
That website has posted made up proposals from this site in the past as speculation. It’s garbage.The "rumour" doesnt have any sources, so it's just stuff they made up.
You aren’t going to find a Devils fan on here willing to part with Nemec. Maybe drop him and Coronato completely.
Vanecek
Foote
1st
For
Markstrom
Hanifin
or
Vanecek
Foote or 1st
For
Markstrom
I’m trying to figure out a trade that makes sense for both teams using the terms in the original post but it’s looking like thats just fan fiction anyway.That’s brutal for Calgary without Nemec. Nemec is a great young Dman and you dropped him out and Coronato which makes the trade less valuable to Calgary. Foote is likely waiver worthy soon and he hasn’t even played this season. Vanecek is a cap dump and has no value. So your saying a late first fro Markstrom and Hanifin. Absurd.
Vanachek + first for Markstrom I could see.I’m trying to figure out a trade that makes sense for both teams using the terms in the original post but it’s looking like thats just fan fiction anyway.
Nemec isn’t being traded. Thats why I dropped him and Coronato. Dropped the Hanifin part because he won’t be needed as Nemec isn’t being traded. That’s how I landed on Vanecek + 1st for Markstrom. Not sure how much value you’re expecting for Markstrom but there’s a 1st (which at this point I’m not even sure I’d do considering it could be a lottery ball).
I’m completely fine with no variation of this trade happening.Nope. Vanecek has negative value and Foote hasn't progressed at all from his draft year. The Flames have zero need for a player like Foot, and he'd be behind at least 5-6 superior forward prospects and young players the Flames already have.
hed make more of an impact than meierNot with the term and avg he wanted/got
Well that’s the point of a trade. Would I do Mercer for Coronato straight up. Sure I could see that.
But where is the part where the Flames are trading a defencemen that is probably top 10 in the league in terms of value when you take out contract status? As well as a high end goalie at a time when there are few goalies playing well? As well as taking Vanacek as a dump. Mercer instead of Nemec is hilariously bad.
Check your own post you didn’t drop out Hanifin in the first proposal. Foote isn’t even playing hockey right now and hasn’t all season So if you consider he has the value of a first you need to stop making proposals.I’m trying to figure out a trade that makes sense for both teams using the terms in the original post but it’s looking like thats just fan fiction anyway.
Nemec isn’t being traded. Thats why I dropped him and Coronato. Dropped the Hanifin part because he won’t be needed as Nemec isn’t being traded. That’s how I landed on Vanecek + 1st for Markstrom. Not sure how much value you’re expecting for Markstrom but there’s a 1st (which at this point I’m not even sure I’d do considering it could be a lottery ball).
In fairness, Fabian Zetterlund would make more of an impact than Timo right now.hed make more of an impact than meier
You’re taking this way too seriously. You’re getting heated over discussion over a fake proposal. Keep your players we’ll keep ours.Check your own post you didn’t drop out Hanifin in the first proposal. Foote isn’t even playing hockey right now and hasn’t all season So if you consider he has the value of a first you need to stop making proposals.
He'd be 39, no thx. Timos finehed make more of an impact than meier
Timo had 11 pts in first 15 games. Zets 16 pts in all 38 to date. Love Zets and Timos not playing, so your pt. works, but there's a differenceIn fairness, Fabian Zetterlund would make more of an impact than Timo right now.
Season from hell for Timo so far with the injuries and lack of performance
I’m completely fine with no variation of this trade happening.
I agree. Devils were linked to Gibson a while back too. I just can’t see nor do I want the Devils to trade Nemec or Mercer for an older goalie. I can see Vanecek, 1st, and a prospect like Stillman or a second for Markstrom.You need a better goalie.
I agree. Devils were linked to Gibson a while back too. I just can’t see nor do I want the Devils to trade Nemec or Mercer for an older goalie. I can see Vanecek, 1st, and a prospect like Stillman or a second for Markstrom.
he was citing 2 articles - the one about trading a C was about McleodDid they mean Mercer instead of Nemec? Mercer is a center the thread title advertised.
Vanecek Mercer Foote 1st
For
Markstrom Hanifin Coronato
That seems light from NJ though but I don’t see Nemec being moved.
Foote isn't an asset. Vanecek is a negative asset. You're asking for a top pairing defenseman and a starting goalie. Hanifin alone is worth more.You aren’t going to find a Devils fan on here willing to part with Nemec. Maybe drop him and Coronato completely.
Vanecek
Foote
1st
For
Markstrom
Hanifin
or
Vanecek
Foote or 1st
For
Markstrom
Coronato has been great in the AHL and isn’t far off being back in the NHL. He’s a good, young player with lots of upside - exactly what the Flames would be looking to receive in any deal they make for their older UFAs. This deal makes no sense at all.
in 9 years lol.He'd be 39, no thx. Timos fine
Vanacek is signed for just over half of what Markstom makes and is 6 years younger as well as only having 1 year left on his deal, there is no chance he's a negative asset. Foote isn't a D so I'd assume any D on waivers would be better than him seeing as he's playing out of position.Foote isn't an asset. Vanecek is a negative asset. You're asking for a top pairing defenseman and a starting goalie. Hanifin alone is worth more.
Foote doesn't equal a 1st, better D are available on waivers. Your deal for Markstrom is an overpay if we just take the 1st.