Is mcdavid too good not to win a cup?

And he was garbage against America, Canada's real opponent.

And so was McDavid, until the winning OT goal. Sound familiar?

But let's get this straight:

If Crosby's five points in the FN are meaningless because none came in the final, what does this say about McDavid's career as he was pointless in the only game that ever mattered in his career, Game 7 of the SCF?

Can we now close this thread because the answer is no, he is not too good because he didn't produce when he had the chance to win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm
It’s not because McDavid can’t produce on his own line, the Oilers start loading up after chasing the game from behind. The first goal often causes a change in schemes for both teams, and the Oilers have had to consistently play from behind. That’s on the goaltending and defensive mistakes of the first D Pair and the bottom two lines. It’s also the bottom two lines for their inability to score or generate any offensive looks. The plan is always to separate McDrai as long as the Oilers are winning or the score is even.

So the Oilers would rather play them separate? Sometimes I guess, but sometimes they start them together. In any event, you are saying it's a reactionary thing to put them together; that they would rather keep them apart as this is more beneficial for the team.

Game 1, they are down 4-0 late in the 2nd due to bad TEAM defense, not just bad goaltending or bad play by the defensemen. Setting aside their contribution to the bad team defense, are McDavid and Draisaitl not partially to blame strictly on the offensive side for not producing through almost two periods?

Game 2 - same story, no production by them through half of the game to possibly make the score closer where they aren't chasing the game

Game 4 - same story, no ES production from either of them leaves them chasing again


We'll see how the rest of the series plays out but so far it looks like their ability to produce on their own is lacking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm
Imagine the 2nd greatest playoff scorer of all time in PPG and a playoff MVP is being blamed for this team not winning the Cup? He does his job as good as anyone else in NHL history whereas others on his team, other forwards, defenseman, and goalies absolutely do not perform at the level needed to win a Cup and no player has ever won the Cup with the amount of underperformance in other areas of their team that McDavid has had, and yet there are people want to point the finger at him.
It’s essentially only Pens fans who are blaming him and calling him overrated.

And we all know why
 
And so was McDavid, until the winning OT goal. Sound familiar?

But let's get this straight:

If Crosby's five points in the FN are meaningless because none came in the final, what does this say about McDavid's career as he was pointless in the only game that ever mattered in his career, Game 7 of the SCF?

Can we now close this thread because the answer is no, he is not too good because he didn't produce when he had the chance to win.

Crosby was garbage in both games against America. If Connor McDavid had taken rounds 2 and 4 off in the playoffs, you might have an analogy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crowfish
??????

He was T1 in team scoring and had the best individual performance of the tournament against Sweden. I guarantee you he wins the MVP if he scored the OT winner unlike McDavid. At age 37.

I guarantee you are wrong. The MVP voting was due 10 minutes before the end of regulation. That's the only reason MacKinnon won it over McDavid.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: sanscosm
It depends on what he wants, really. Does he want to be an Oiler for life? Then he might never win one. Does he want to win at all costs? Then I have no doubt he can win multiple Cups.
 
I guarantee you are wrong. The MVP voting was due 10 minutes before the end of regulation. That's the only reason MacKinnon won it over McDavid.

Nice try. Seems like McDavid wasn't on their radar.


"The award was voted on by a panel of 12 members of the four broadcasts in the tournament: ESPN, TNT, TVA, and Sportsnet. Much like the Conn Smythe Trophy in the Stanley Cup Final, the votes are submitted before the conclusion of the game, with some stipulations for game-winning goals and any other last minute events."
 
Their overall team defense has looked bad; not just the d-men or goalie. It's a constant theme, and not a surpising one, given how much they push trying to out offense their opponent.
The defensive problems are individual mistakes rather than pushing for offense. The Oilers aren’t rushing and making high danger cross ice passes, they were mainly dumping and chasing. Bouchard, Nurse and others lost their man, turned over the puck, and missed defensive rotations. Third goal last game was McDavid winning the faceoff, Bouchard failing to control the puck, losing it, and conceding a breakaway to Fiala of all people. Those are mistakes.
same story, no ES production from either of them leaves them chasing again
McDavid created a few chances before the third period, such as the empty net Hyman missed. The whole team apart from McDrai seem to only start playing to their full potential once they are behind for some reason. McDavid can’t do much on his line when his linemates are whiffing chances, aren’t winning board battles, can’t make basic passes etc. it’s a five v five game.
 
Last edited:
Nice try. Seems like McDavid wasn't on their radar.


"The award was voted on by a panel of 12 members of the four broadcasts in the tournament: ESPN, TNT, TVA, and Sportsnet. Much like the Conn Smythe Trophy in the Stanley Cup Final, the votes are submitted before the conclusion of the game, with some stipulations for game-winning goals and any other last minute events."

We both know the voters are not bothering to put special instructions on their ballots lol. Come on man. Compared to if they watch the OT goal get scored and then vote afterwards, it would be night and day voting.
 
We both know the voters are not bothering to put special instructions on their ballots lol. Come on man. Compared to if they watch the OT goal get scored and then vote afterwards, it would be night and day voting.

I guess you have some inside knowledge on this.

So if McDavid deserved Mac's MVP at the Four Nations, did Crosby deserve Teows' award at the 2010 Olympics?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm
The defensive problems are individual mistakes rather than pushing for offense. The Oilers aren’t rushing and making high danger cross ice passes, they were mainly dumping and chasing. Bouchard, Nurse and others lost their man, turned over the puck, and missed defensive rotations. Third goal last game was McDavid winning the faceoff, Bouchard failing to control the puck, losing it, and conceding a breakaway to Fiala of all people. Those are mistakes.

What a surprise that the Oilers have an offensive d-man putting up gaudy offensive numbers at the expense of solid defense.
 
What a surprise that the Oilers have an offensive d-man putting up gaudy offensive numbers at the expense of solid defense.
No “defensive system” is going to make Bouchard stop making utterly boneheaded plays.

Again, it’s absolutely hilarious watching the things you and the other two Pens fans are resorting to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheLegend27
They don't get to round 4 if not for Crosby in Round 1 and Round 3. But, hey, let's give the W to peak McDavid over a 37 year old Crosby since you are so worked up over it.
But you can say the exact thing for Crosby 2010... he doesn't score the golden goal if his teammates don't drag him to the overtime of the finals. He wasn't instrumental for most of the tournament.
 
Last edited:
Argue today Crosby fans its not going to matter in the long run. Cups or no cups for McDavid, he's higher on the totem pole when its all said and done.
That’s the thing - Pens' energy is being wasted here. The vast majority already know McDavid is better and greater. The last poll was an 80-20 split in favor of McDavid, and this will only go up. No one seriously thinks Crosby is better than McDavid outside of Pens fans. Just give up, it's a lost battle. They should get ahead and start drafting papers for arguments against Mackinnon and Kucherov; those guys have the peak but lack longevity to be compared with Crosby for now.

Kucherov has a better peak season, more Art Rosses, might have the same amount of Harts, two Stanley Cups, more 30-point playoff runs, and doesn’t seem to be slowing down. He just needs the longevity.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad