Please tell me what you would have done differently. I want specific examples.
I don't care about Clowe right now. He's hurt. It costs our billionaire turd owner real dollars and doesn't hurt our cap at the moment. In terms of ability, I'll wait for him to actually play.
Brunner and Ryder have sucked, but I defended both moves at the time so I'm not going to go back and blame Lou in hindsight. Jagr has been awesome.
DeBoer shoulder's a lot of blame right now. When I can rant about specific personnel mistakes being made as their being made, only to see those exact personnel mistakes directly costing us games, there's something wrong. Brodeur should not have been in net last night, Harrold shouldn't be on the ice when we have 6 other healthy D-men, Gionta shouldn't play over Josefson, Janssen shouldn't play over Tedenby. It's common sense moves and he's screwing them all up.
NJ CUP, New Owners will not fire Lou the same year they bought the team.
Now it's only the "observing" phase for them. Once the offseason arrives, I'm sure they'll provide Lou with plenty of dough and tell him : FIX THIS TEAM.
And then we can say that Lou is on the "warm" seat.....The New Owners could care less how many players that were full of talent LEFT under Lou's watch before their tenure.
lets face it lou will never be "fired". he will "retire" and it will save everyone face.
the contract talks mid season you mention is 1000000% spot on. you should never allow any of your key players to even entertain the idea of UFA. they should locked up and taken care of long before that even comes up. a similar situation will come up with cory. this team will have that cloud hanging over its head all of next year also. esp when he will hand marty a 2 year deal so he can hit 700 wins!
have to clean house from the top down.
as many gems as conte has found he has to go.
stevens he has to go either send him to albany or send him packing. neither will happen since stevens is a legend around here and thus you create another problem. when do you tell your legend time to go?
NJ Cup here?
oh boy.
I don't know who he is but he is making a couple of valid points. It's a breath of fresh air (for me), compared to all the ass kissers we have around here who keep on saying that Lou can't do no wrong, despite the piss poor track we've had over the past decade.
I think its unfair to fire a GM after 20 years of success because the team hasn't been performing 2 out of the last 3, with a Stanley Cup Finals appearance sandwiched in between.
I'm not saying he's been perfect, far from it in fact (I wish he'd ****ing re-sign players DURING the regular season!!), but I think its unfair to throw him under the bus because the team hasn't made the playoffs every single year. Every organization goes through this, teams dip for a while then get better, just because its happening to New Jersey now doesn't mean its time to ditch Lou, especially since the team wouldn't have its track record of winning without him.
I'm not a fan of a lot of his moves at times, and keeping the 29th pick was lunacy and obviously a strange case of over-confidence from Lou, but I don't think its a fireable offense. After a while, I truly believe a GM builds a reputation and Lamoriello's is second to none. He took a garbage team and made it into a borderline dynasty in 95 to 03. Five Stanley Cup finals appearances, playoffs basically every season, it seems extremely unfair to throw that all away because of mediocre results right now. I understand this is a "what have you done for me lately?" game, but Lamoriello has proven to know exactly what it takes to win, and after two decades, its kind of wrong to tell him to **** off when he's earned the right to be given a chance to turn the ship around, after everything he's done for this organization.
also making the playoffs and getting bounced in the 1st round isn't my idea of "success"
I think its unfair to fire a GM after 20 years of success because the team hasn't been performing 2 out of the last 3, with a Stanley Cup Finals appearance sandwiched in between.
I'm not saying he's been perfect, far from it in fact (I wish he'd ****ing re-sign players DURING the regular season!!), but I think its unfair to throw him under the bus because the team hasn't made the playoffs every single year. Every organization goes through this, teams dip for a while then get better, just because its happening to New Jersey now doesn't mean its time to ditch Lou, especially since the team wouldn't have its track record of winning without him.
I'm not a fan of a lot of his moves at times, and keeping the 29th pick was lunacy and obviously a strange case of over-confidence from Lou, but I don't think its a fireable offense. After a while, I truly believe a GM builds a reputation and Lamoriello's is second to none. He took a garbage team and made it into a borderline dynasty in 95 to 03. Five Stanley Cup finals appearances, playoffs basically every season, it seems extremely unfair to throw that all away because of mediocre results right now. I understand this is a "what have you done for me lately?" game, but Lamoriello has proven to know exactly what it takes to win, and after two decades, its kind of wrong to tell him to **** off when he's earned the right to be given a chance to turn the ship around, after everything he's done for this organization.
It's not Lou's either, but 1/30 wins the cup. What are you going to do? Should Poile be fired? McPhee in Washington? Maloney in PHX? What have those guys done?
i love it when people in defense of lou come up with this reason.
or even better "who would you replace lou with"
to answer your question though i have no clue if they should be fired. i dont care if they get fired or stay. i'm not on hf boards washington or yotes. i'm on the hf boards for the devils talking about a team and gm i know and follow not some other teams.
should they fire them? yeah fire them if it makes the devils chances of being better?