TopShelfGloveSide
Registered User
- Dec 10, 2018
- 20,912
- 30,610
I mean on the season obviously and this is isn’t even true. (I don’t think)How about three months?
I mean on the season obviously and this is isn’t even true. (I don’t think)How about three months?
Arguably the best goalie in the world (Hellebyuck) doesn't even have that W%.
And before the inevitable "but if he was on the Oilers!!!" argument - the Jets outpace the Oilers in expected goals, only have 3 less real goals in one less game, and are only 3 goals worse in total expected goals against. They're very much in the ballpark of the same team so far this year.
If our demand is that Skinner should be the best goalie in the league then great. It isn't reasonable, but sure. If the demand is that he's good enough to get us wins, then he's already there. The next step is building consistency and not sliding for weeks on end or totally cratering. The last week or so has smelled like the start of a slide, let's see how he manages it.
Saying "any #1" should just have a .800 W% on the Oilers is absurd. The current results reflect a mid-level ish starter, which is what he is.
Wow, just wow. So you expect .930 and the oilers to sweep every series?
The only problem he had last year was the Canuck’s series. I think you need to look for some reality…
I mean on the season obviously and this is isn’t even true.
If he was the second best goalie against the Kings we're history. Unless you think Big Save Dave was better?Sub .900 3/5 games vs LA
Sub .900 4/5 games vs VAN
Good against Dallas
Sub .900 3/7 games against FLA (including game 1 where we outshot Florida 32-18 and lost, sound familiar)
We had the 2nd best goaltender in 3/4 series, including in Vancouver where they were icing a Latvian AHLer
??? All strengths the Jets are 10 xGF and 17xGA behind us. Good for a goal differential swing of 27. They're literally our opposite. Mediocre team carried by elite goaltending.
Of course, expecting Skinner to play at Hellebuyck's level isn't reasonable so the rest of your post is fine but yeah. We're way better than the Jets.
Sub .900 3/5 games vs LA
Sub .900 4/5 games vs VAN
Good against Dallas
Sub .900 3/7 games against FLA (including game 1 where we outshot Florida 32-18 and lost, sound familiar)
We had the 2nd best goaltender in 3/4 series, including in Vancouver where they were icing a Latvian AHLer
You’re really over selling Talbot and Silovs, Talbot wasn’t good, Silovs maybe had two good games.
And Bob was below .900 in three games of the final and in three games of round one against the Lightning.
Sound Familiar….
That 2nd goal was pathetic. If SKinner just drops into a butterfly, where he already was, it just hits his pad. He doesn't even attempt to drop until it's too late. I don't even know what he was doing.
Bouchard had the player...lolLook over the player? Bouchard had the player so he wasn’t in the eyes of the goalie.
I hear you.The Oilers have the sixth lowest goals against in the NHL with Skinner getting the bulk of the starts and not getting to play almost strictly bottom ten teams like Pickard does. And after every loss its the same old song and dance, even some times after a win that the Oilers need a better goalie...
What does any of this have to do with last nights game and how leaky he was with rebounds?Logan Thompson is 22-2-3 with a .925 SV% and #1 in the NHL in goals saved above expected. He's averaging saving a goal against every single game better than the numbers expect him to. The Caps are succeeding because of him. The Oilers are succeeding in SPITE of their goaltending.
I have watched it numerous times now. Bouchard didnt do nearly enough on that play.To be fair, Protas is 6’6 230lbs and extremely strong on his skates. There’s maybe 5 defenders in the NHL that would have a hope of clearing him from the crease. That’s a situation where you need your goalie to fight through the screen for a sight line.
The sv% doesnt always paint an accurate picture.Hyperbole. A .786 save percentage in a game your team dominated is unacceptably bad.
Yup agreed. Hopefully Skinner catches fire again.I'm not disagreeing, just sharing my thoughts from the coaches' perspective, they like Pickard, but they don't trust him completely
As someone who believes that we need to address goaltending, I do agree that it is a bit over the top but that's just what happens when a huge chunk of the fanbase feels a certain way and everyone feels the desire to express themselves. It just naturally leads to piling on and going overboard. Ultimately these boards are for fan entertainment and it is our right.I hear you.
Its making these PGT threads almost unreadable.
I agree.As someone who believes that we need to address goaltending, I do agree that it is a bit over the top but that's just what happens when a huge chunk of the fanbase feels a certain way and everyone feels the desire to express themselves. It just naturally leads to piling on and going overboard. Ultimately these boards are for fan entertainment and it is our right.
My advice to any player is to not engage with social media at all. But, there is hope that management takes notice
I saw that the defense of Skinner involves pointing out that Pickard is getting easier opponents. I have time for that point. My ideal outcome involves keeping Skinner actually. I want Pickard as the #3 (yes, I don't want him gone either). We need a tandem goalie to play with Skinner, and truly share the workload. That may give us better results, and at the very least it will give us important context about Skinner. Right now we have no one to really compare him to. We just have stats that show that our goalie numbers aren't where they "should" be
I do know that quite well actually. And I give skinner props when he’s playing well.What does any of this have to do with last nights game and how leaky he was with rebounds?
I have watched it numerous times now. Bouchard didnt do nearly enough on that play.
Honestly I have no freaking idea what he was trying to do there.
The sv% doesnt always paint an accurate picture.
You know that right?
Decent opportunity? You are really suggesting that the first and 3rd goals were 'decent' opportuniies?I do know that quite well actually. And I give skinner props when he’s playing well.
You do realize that the sv% showed exactly what was going on last night though, right? Every decent opportunity went right through stu. I have absolutely no issue with the two on one goal. That was really well executed. The other two were soft. And he was beat cleanly on a few more that luckily didn’t end up in the net. He was not tracking the puck at all. Was not square to the play. Had a terrible give away. And put up a .786 on a night where his team dominated.
I was hoping he had gotten in the groove and we were going to get some sort of consistent goaltending out of him. But he’s been off again for the last number of games. Not good enough. Period.
Thompson saved like 5 chances equal to the third goal. Yeah. It was a decent opportunity. Nothing more. I already said the first goal was a good one. Second goal was abhorrent. And the third goal was a save he needs to make. Especially after stinking up the second goal.Decent opportunity? You are really suggesting that the first and 3rd goals were 'decent' opportuniies?
That really takes away from everything else you posted.
Yup, they’re even going back to last year’s playoffs trying to plead their case. LaughableHis fan club will shrug and blame everyone else
Basically anybody here is saying that if we had even an average #1 then our record would be stellar. To wit when the Oilers have even got .900 save % out of goalies this season they are winning almost all those games.Arguably the best goalie in the world (Hellebyuck) doesn't even have that W%.
And before the inevitable "but if he was on the Oilers!!!" argument - the Jets outpace the Oilers in expected goals, only have 3 less real goals in one less game, and are only 3 goals worse in total expected goals against. They're very much in the ballpark of the same team so far this year.
If our demand is that Skinner should be the best goalie in the league then great. It isn't reasonable, but sure. If the demand is that he's good enough to get us wins, then he's already there. The next step is building consistency and not sliding for weeks on end or totally cratering. The last week or so has smelled like the start of a slide, let's see how he manages it.
Saying "any #1" should just have a .800 W% on the Oilers is absurd. The current results reflect a mid-level ish starter, which is what he is.
Its 2024. Nobody cares. He's had several yrs to look and play like even a semblance of a #1 goalie and he wants this gig. He doesn't improve at much but here we are.He's not even supposed to be the starter. It's just that the guy who was supposed to be the solution did so poorly he's not even in the NHL anymore.
You’re the one tossing blame at everyone but skinner on that second goal.Decent opportunity? You are really suggesting that the first and 3rd goals were 'decent' opportuniies?
That really takes away from everything else you posted.
When you have no logical reply just label those your arguing with haters. Thats always top level convincing. The above you should know are team stats. Its testament to how much the Oilers team in front of Skinner shuts it down with series on the line. It has little to do with Skinner beign great or anything.So a goalie can’t have a bad game?
And a .912 is pretty good for 2.6 million. And to you his stats in games 5,6, and 7 (prior to game seven of the final) in last year’s playoffs mean nothing in his ability to win a cup?
View attachment 965442
You just discount everything cause you hate the player. You also like I did pointed out his numbers are getting better after the start of the year when the whole team was bad. And yes Skinners was on said team and has gotten better and is still improving.
Stop being hfhivemind!You’re the one tossing blame at everyone but skinner on that second goal.
Did you see that attempt at a butterfly? Was straight embarrassing.