Is contraction something the WHL would consider at this time?
I'm not that plugged into the management level of the league as some, but I doubt it. Just looking on wikipedia, the last time a franchise outright folded was the Spokane Flyers in 1982.
I'm also not sure who you take out. Prince Albert, Kootenay, and Swift Current are the 3 teams in the attendance basement (game according to hockeydb's 2017-18 season-to-date stats). Kootenay just got new ownership this year committed to keeping them in Cranbrook. So chances are they'll have a few seasons to try to work things out before they are at risk again. SC and PA are both 30+ year members of the league with a fair amount of history behind them, and Swift Current in particular still fills almost 3/4s of its arena capacity in spite of the small attendance total.
The next tier is Prince George, Tri-City, and Vancouver. The Giants just moved to Langley and have a long lease at the LEC, plus they are filling a respectable 62% of the building even with a drop of nearly 600 people/game over last year (somewhat understandable when last year's team was a tire fire) Plus they're kind of a hub team for getting to Victoria and down into the US division. Tri-City is up to about 30 years of history in its current location and seems to be pretty steady attendance-wise.
Maybe Prince George is the odd-team out? They're 50% capacity on their arena this year, saw an attendance drop in spite of having a good team last year, are generally low-attendance for the past few years, and are, relatively speaking, the outpost city in BC, with absolutely no one being all that close to them geographically. They do have new ownership as of 3 years ago though.
I know there are probably a lot of people on the contraction bandwagon because of the whole "smaller league = better teams" thing just like the NHL. But I don't know where you can start taking from that doesn't mean you're either losing a good performing org or one with a ton of history behind it.
Would Port Alberni be a good place to put a WHL team if they had the rink? Population is more than Swift Current and if Nanaimo got a team it'd be good for them and Victoria as well.
Port Alberni is a terrible place for a WHL team. They have a tremendously unstable economy that relies far too much on the forestry and pulp & paper industries, it has a significantly lower population base than Nanaimo, the Comox Valley, and the Cowichan Valley and is far less accessible than any of those other areas.Wanted to hear someone's opinion on this one. Port Alberni has the size for a WHL team, if they added some seats to that arena I think they'll be good to go.
Wow, Domino's falling all over potentially should on of the Seattle teams don't make it.
I think Port Alberni could not make ago of it. I think Nanaimo so rejected the arena proposal, I know people there are bitter about ties there and the idea of a publicly funded arena makes them rage. Nanaimo is off the table for quite awhile.
Commix/Courtenay is the next best choice on the island. Fast growing community, beautiful spot, only two hours from Vic. I think they need an area however.
The US division would have a hole in it if the teams in Seattle don't make it.
Maybe a Portland, Comox, Victoria, Vancouver, Tri-city division works.
Take Kamloops, Kelowna, Spokane, Kootenay and make them one? PG as well..
Someone will take me to task on my geography...lol
Wenatchee has been "interesting" to me to say the least.
Of all the untapped markets who could be persuaded to pay a base $25-30 for a single game ticket and at least $20 per game for season ticket, Wenatchee? I'm not persuaded. It's no accident that WHL teams south of the 49th have been in larger markets. Wenatchee just isn't big enough.
Yet... more luxury suites than Portland. That arena means something. I just have the squirrely feeling it doesn't mean enough.
You could create a artic division
Alaska
Dawson City
Whitehorse
Yellowknife
The dub can have the Wild. They always beat up on my Spruce KingsWhat about Wenatchee? Have an arena as well as the best attendance in the BCHL. Grande Prairie would be another potential destination considering they have a rising population and an arena.
I have a question, Please dont attack if its wrong.
I would think the if WHL would want more teams - Would they not look to move into the LA area or even San Jose.
Yes you would have to fly or Bus to Sea ( or when the East plays they fly from SEA to San Jose)
But you would add more fans and No Jr A teams anywhere.
near these locations.) USHL or NAHL)
* Adding more USA players in the WHL
*US dollars coming in to the league
* Many arenas are built already
* San Jose /LA are already established as hockey towns
*San Jose is a hockey town, and with a Pop of over 1 million.
* Adding new and more Sponsorship from the California region
Some of the cities that you are looking in Canada have less then 50k people.
If you had San Jose /LA/ Tri/ Everett/Spok (Sea) /Port ( They could bus)
Move Sea or Spok to BC division
Then each would have 6.
What team would not want to travel to California in Jan,Feb or March ?
Rumblings Wpg is getting a team, not by expansion though. I'll leave it at that![]()
BC Team City starts with a C ends with a K
Too obvious... and we've been told the buyer wants to stay put.
Of course, people get told lots of things.
Cache Creek?BC Team City starts with a C ends with a K