Toggle sidebar

Is Erik Karlsson in fact the best Swedish player still?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Is Erik Karlsson in fact the best Swedish player still?

  • Yes

  • Borderline

  • He’s the most talented but not the best anymore

  • No

Results are only viewable after voting.
matsqq said:
But Erik had positive numbers in +/- in both the series and in the stanley cup finals that year. Do you seomehow mean that Erik was responsible for what happened when he was off the ice too ? He should have prevented goals then too ?
Click to expand...
Edited late but it’s more to the point suggesting that the team found success because of a coach’s correct evaluation. They found success on a fluke run wherein an offensive dynamo outpaced his deficiencies

I’ll cop to being disorganized in thought, wasn’t intended to be a direct progression as much as “success” being questionable due to fluke run> coach assessment didn’t lead to meaningful success> supposed meaningful success doesn’t validate supposed capability
 
Last edited:
zenthusiast said:
considering the high point of that success was a team with a negative goal differential both in the regular season and the playoffs going to a conference final I think it’s fair to question their star defenseman’s ability to prevent goals. A sublime talent in two phases of the game can still be a liability in the third

E: rather, I suppose it’s more fitting to question whether that success stemmed from proper coaching judgment and keying on that
Click to expand...
Ottawa playoffs 2017: 47GF 50GA

Karlsson ON: 32GF 16 GA
Karlsson OFF: 15 GF 34 GA
28:08 AVTOI

on the ice for 10/11 GWG.

that team was literally a bottom 5 roster without Karlsson.

and yea every coach realized that they had a generational talent and the only way a budget team like the senators would find success is if they played Karlsson as much as humanly possible.

Karlsson on= elite two way 5 on 5 team
Karlsson off= dog trash 5 on 5 team
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane and NyQuil
Agent Zuuuub said:
Ottawa playoffs 2017: 47GF 50GA

Karlsson ON: 32GF 16 GA
Karlsson OFF: 15 GF 34 GA
28:08 AVTOI

on the ice for 10/11 GWG.

that team was literally a bottom 5 roster without Karlsson.

and yea every coach realized that they had a generational talent and the only way a budget team like the senators would find success is if they played Karlsson as much as humanly possible.

Karlsson on= elite two way 5 on 5 team
Karlsson off= dog trash 5 on 5 team
Click to expand...

A lot of people have a lot of misconceptions about that particular run.

Consider the shot differentials with the Bergeron line and Karlsson both on and off of the ice. You can see the clear divide I’m talking about in both instances:

Embedded Image


From a pure territorial advantage, both units are picking apart the opposition (note: scoring chances are strikingly similar from a percentage basis). But the disparity on the Karlsson side is the clear takeaway here. Boston is getting absolutely caved in whenever he’s on the ice, and that’s close to half of the game (he’s averaging close to 28 minutes a night). That puts an incredible amount of pressure on the Bruins to try to win the minutes he’s not out there. If the goals aren’t coming – and they aren’t right now for Boston – you’re in a bad spot.

A lot has been made about Karlsson’s scoring (he already has five assists in the series, a few of which have been of the highlight-reel variety), but the real hallmark of this series is in the data above. Boston simply can’t sustain offensive zone pressure when he’s out there. If they lose the puck, he recovers it and instantly breaks out – something the rest of the Ottawa defensive corps struggles with. Far too frequently he takes a high-pressure situation in the defensive zone and turns it into offensive zone time.
Click to expand...

www.tsn.ca

Karlsson is dominating the Bruins - TSN.ca

The ice is tilting toward Ottawa every time the Senators captain comes over the boards in the first-round series, Travis Yost writes.
www.tsn.ca www.tsn.ca

Anyway, he's not that guy anymore, but clearly people have forgotten how dominant he was in 2017 at both ends of the ice.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm and Agent Zuuuub
NyQuil said:
A lot of people have a lot of misconceptions about that particular run.



www.tsn.ca

Karlsson is dominating the Bruins - TSN.ca

The ice is tilting toward Ottawa every time the Senators captain comes over the boards in the first-round series, Travis Yost writes.
www.tsn.ca www.tsn.ca

Anyway, he's not that guy anymore, but clearly people have forgotten how dominant he was in 2017 at both ends of the ice.
Click to expand...
I'm convinced Karlsson wins the Conn Smythe that year if the Senators score the goal in game 7 OT instead of the Penguins. Regardless who actually wins the SCF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agent Zuuuub and NyQuil
Erik Alfredsson said:
He's still extremely talented. I imagine he'll end up being Sweden's best player in this tournament.
Click to expand...

Love watching him in best on best when he can play to his strengths and not have to be mr everything

I always said that for all the flash it was all the small subtle plays that were actually his strength and in best on best those plays get even more mileage
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm
Erik Alfredsson said:
He's still extremely talented. I imagine he'll end up being Sweden's best player in this tournament.
Click to expand...
Seems unlikely as he was 6th in ES MPG in that first game last for all Swedish Dmen.

He played fine but the OP is on EK65, a little known toxin that is released any time Karlsson has a good game and clouds overall judgment.

Feels nice but don't drive or operate heavy equipment.
 
Sasha Orlov said:
Literally all this shows is that he is good offensively and can break out of the D zone with his offensive skills
Click to expand...

Actually it shows that when he's on the ice, the other team cannot register shots on net relative to when he isn’t.

Its hard to score when you’re in your own end the entire game, or you can’t get any offensive zone time because EK is moving it out so effectively.

Dave Tippett said:
Phoenix Coyotes Coach Dave Tippett once discussed a particular issue he was having in analyzing his defensemen, while he was coaching in juniors.

“We had a player that was supposed to be a great, shut-down defenseman. He was supposedly the be-all, end-all of defensemen. But when you did a 10-game analysis of him, you found out he was defending all the time because he can’t move the puck.

Then, we had another guy who supposedly couldn’t defend a lick. Well, he was defending only 20 percent of the time because he’s making good plays out of our end. He may not be the strongest defender, but he’s only doing it 20 percent of the time. So the equation works out better the other way. I ended up trading the other defenseman.”
Click to expand...

You might figure this out one day depending on how Lane Hutson develops.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: matsqq
NyQuil said:
Actually it shows that when he's on the ice, the other team cannot register shots on net relative to when he isn’t.

Its hard to score when you’re in your own end the entire game, or you can’t get any offensive zone time because EK moving it out.
Click to expand...
I agree with this
 
wetcoast said:
He played fine but the OP is on EK65, a little known toxin that is released any time Karlsson has a good game and clouds overall judgment.

Feels nice but don't drive or operate heavy equipment.
Click to expand...

Let's juxtapose this with yourself that has been consistently shitting on EK on this site over the years.

Just for good measure.
 
NyQuil said:
Actually it shows that when he's on the ice, the other team cannot register shots on net relative to when he isn’t.

Its hard to score when you’re in your own end the entire game, or you can’t get any offensive zone time because EK is moving it out so effectively.



You might figure this out one day depending on how Lane Hutson develops.
Click to expand...

20% of the time??

Let's not go overboard here. In the NHL, even the very best OFD on the best teams getting a flood of ozone starts are still seeing at least 40% of the shot attempts against.

But I wholeheartedly agree with the notion of 'defensive dman', especially while developing, often equals 'he's always in his own zone by design.'
 
Raccoon Jesus said:
20% of the time??

Let's not go overboard here. In the NHL, even the very best OFD on the best teams getting a flood of ozone starts are still seeing at least 40% of the shot attempts against.

But I wholeheartedly agree with the notion of 'defensive dman', especially while developing, often equals 'he's always in his own zone by design.'
Click to expand...

I think Dave Tippett may have been a bit hyperbolic as opposed to trying to be precise.
 
pretty sad actually that the caliber of player he is/was and outside of a cinderalla run in 17 he has been on absolutely terrible teams.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom