User9992
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2016
- 1,494
- 940
Is Connor Bedard more like McDavid level talent or closer to Drai/Matthews/Mackinnon in terms of talent?
I beg to differ, McDavid losing a step is still a 120-130 point player, the way he thinks the game is completely different. He decided to win the rocket instead of dishing more, he's that great, he does what he wants on the ice. His skating his certainly tiers above the rest but it's not why he's the best in the world.McDavid wouldn't be McDavid without his otherworldly skating. Bedard is smaller and doesn't have that transcendant element to his game.
I honestly think Bedard will be a great player, but I don't see what some of posters see, and I've watched a ton of Bedard. He's way, way below a McDavid / Crosby level for me, but we have posters here that act like he's near that level, he's not.
Daigle scored 2.58 ppg in his draft year.He was more productive/dominant than McDavid during his junior career and dominated the WJCs along with being the best goalscoring prospect from the CHL since Mario.
When have we seen a prospect who put up generational/all-time great production not meet that level in the NHL? The answer is never.
Wayne, Mario, Lindros, Crosby, McDavid all met the hype.
Daigle scored 2.58 ppg in his draft year.
I wasn't watching Junior hockey in 1992-93 but by numerous accounts he did dominate.Did he dominate the league the way those players did?
I wasn't watching Junior hockey in 1992-93 but by numerous accounts he did dominate.
No he didn't dominate in the same fashion as Lemieux and Crosby. Neither did McDavid though, did he?It is pretty easy to determine if he dominated the league statistically or not as much as those other players. And even if he did, Daigle was the exception and wasn't projected to be the bust that he was.
Based on his numbers in the WHL, Bedard projects to be as good as Crosby/McDavid.
No he didn't dominate in the same fashion as Lemieux and Crosby. Neither did McDavid though, did he?