KirkAlbuquerque
#FireSullivan
WeirdCouldn't care less what a group of cognitively flawed people think
WeirdCouldn't care less what a group of cognitively flawed people think
It’s taking away credit for something that did actually happen and then disparaging for some ridiculous hypothetical.You ignored the part after about what if he was in Buffalo etc.
It's using the Halo Effect to make a player's subjective assessment. Barkov is the same player even if he plays on a cellar dweller, but by the luck of playing on a Cup winner, his assessment as an individual player shines brighter.
It's not an argument against Barkov per se, it's an argument against using any team accomplishment in an individual player's resume.
Because we’re talking about the Hockey Hall of Fame, the one that exists in our dimension not the alternate dimension one you must be thinking of.Why is that weird?
Which is why this dimensions version is watered down and not as valuable as my dimensionBecause we’re talking about the Hockey Hall of Fame, the one that exists in our dimension not the alternate dimension one you must be thinking of.
And that is something that voters in our dimension care about.
So I’m saying that captaining 2 cup teams will help Barkov in addition to all the other credentials he has .
Not just watered down....it's flooded!Barkov, Marchand, and bobrovsky are in.
Not just watered down....it's flooded!![]()
Covid years are kind of a blur.
can't argue with you there, too much mid in the HHoFWhich is why this dimensions version is watered down and not as valuable as my dimension![]()
That plus the Selkes speak volumes too. It's rare to find stud, all around #1 C's.Winning is a team achievement but being the captain and the first-line center of a winning team is still very much an individual honour/achievement. Why shouldn't it be considered?
Ought to be.Are you arguing based on what the hall of fame is or what you think the hall of fame ought to be?
How you can have barasso and Vernon but not bobrovsky in there, as an example.
If Mike Vernon can get in...then it should be a participation award honour.Barkov is one of the few NHL players currently under 30 that has a HHOF resume & should be a 1st ballot lock if he retired right now.
Just say bias, no need to impress anyone with the Halo effect, it's a freaking hockey board not Harvard.But the issue I see is you're still attributing to that player what is a team accomplishment.
Switch places between McDavid and Barkov. Now what? You say he captained a Cup finalist two seasons in a row as a point on his resume?
Put Barkov in Ottawa, Columbus, Buffalo
...he's not the same kind of player and captain? He needs his captaincy and numbers justified by playing on a team thst wins a Cup?
You've unwittingly made an argument for why the HHoF and anything voted on by people is a flawed system- the Halo Effect is too tempting a trap to fall into
No they don't and please stop trying to push that silly narrative.And come with an asterisk next to every achievement
I literally LoL at this.Just say bias, no need to impress anyone with the Halo effect, it's a freaking hockey board not Harvard.
56.87 isn't it?And everyone has bias, you have presented yours already in this thread...or perhaps it was another one, you post a ton , like somewhere around 58.67 posts/day.![]()
No they don't and please stop trying to push that silly narrative.
One can talk about context and uneven schedules during COVID and the 12-13 and 94-95 seasons and WWII years ect but the whole asterisk thing is just silly.
That's the season of record, don't try to alter reality, comment on it if you must for contest.
Reasonable people can do that right?
I’ve been lobbying the league to remove the 2020 playoffs and subsequent 2021 season/playoffs from the register altogether since autumn 2020. They’re sick of me but I have a solid legal team that keeps the fight alive
Ugh.If he wasn’t a lock when the thread started, he is now. 3 Selkes, back to back Cups. Plenty of time to go.