Makes zero sense to me but whatever
View attachment 939366
dom's
model spitting out this data makes sense to me (heavily relies upon data sample from the previous year), but it's journalistic malpractice to publish this data at face value and pass it off as "analysis" from dom himself.
the jackets aren't riding an unsustainably hot power play, or getting a crazy goaltending run. their 5v5 PDO isn't due for any regression (it's at 1.001, lol).
if dom was actually doing
analytics rather than
reporting (in the data sense, not journalistic) he would have dug deeper or added a huge caveat that the model essentially still thinks this is a pascal vincent team.
doing actual
analysis on this would also uncover that their one stretch of bad play – the west coast trip – actually saw them have bad puck luck
and happened without a key driver of offense in kent johnson.
there's so much to like about this blue jackets team – maybe it's not all sustainable, but there aren't any warning signs that the wheels are going to fall off, either. they have clear areas for improvement (goaltending, special teams) and capital to make moves. and at some point they'll get jenner back.
it's still early, but based solely on how they've played
this year they've instilled more confidence as a potential bubble team than most of the names above them.