The tournament wouldn't lead right into training camp. If it starts late July or early August, it would be done a month before training camp.
And moving WHC to summer would give the guys who would've been there anyways that rest in May.
some of the responses in this thread makes me sad and angry
instead if moving the WC to July why not start the NHL in September?
Why should the NHL DICTATE to the WC what to do?
The NHL DOES NOT PLAY NICELY WITH ANYONE, they do not think they have to
The IIHF is doing more to grow hockey then the NHL is
We now look at Swiss as almost a power house and part the uppercrust of International hockey
well for ten years or more then got their heads handed to them at the WC--it grew the game in the country and they are now developing home grown talent and the NHL is taking notice
what is the NHL doing to grow the game? Besides acting like king s*it and having people kiss their ring?
About 4 years ago the IIHF offered to move the WC to September every four years and have the games held in North America--THE NHL TURNED THIS DOWN as they wanted COMPLETE control
if the NHL wont play nicely why should anyone else play nicely? other have only to be shutdown by the NHL
Not play nice with the NHL? How's that possible when the NHL holds all the power? The only way international hockey is gonna thrive is if power dynamics change.
Not that it isn't possible though; the NHL only agreed to fully honor Euro-league contracts once the KHL showed it had the reciprocal ability to poach NHL talent. Bettman and co. agreed to that 'memorandum of understanding' super fast afterwards. Hopefully something similar will happen that will benefit international hockey.
What's wrong with September?
There was a hockey forum in Barcelona. I believe in 2012. The KHL proposed a very similar model as you described. All events held in February.If I were Hockey God, I'd mandate a break every February across leagues for international tournaments - be it Olympics, WC, whatever. Every year, a two-week hiatus or so to get it taken care of. Most players get a mid-season break to recover, some go off to play for glory.
I'm not Hockey God, and I don't know about the Euro leagues, but the NHL would never do this. A pity.
I don't see it that way. Players are headed to camp anyway. Rather than to vacation/recovery time.Start of domestic seasons, more complicated than their end.
I doubt it. Players would be fresher.Also level of play would be worse.
I would have to believe you'd have a better chance of attracting fans in September than July. Who wants to go watch hockey in July?attendance quite possibly too.
I don't see it that way. Players are headed to camp anyway. Rather than to vacation/recovery time.
I doubt it. Players would be fresher.
I would have to believe you'd have a better chance of attracting fans in September than July. Who wants to go watch hockey in July?
I don't see it that way. Players are headed to camp anyway. Rather than to vacation/recovery time.
I doubt it. Players would be fresher.
I would have to believe you'd have a better chance of attracting fans in September than July. Who wants to go watch hockey in July?
Then injuries would be an even bigger concern than now or July, since they wouldn't have the summer to rehab.If you really want all NHL players to be available while not cutting into their vacations, September is a much better choice than July.
-Start NHL season September
(from what I can tell, most other pro leagues are already going in September, and most people here, including myself are counting down the days waiting for the season to start anyways)
-Move All Star Game to preseason, should shorten regular season another 5 days or so
(Its not like NHL All Stars are fighting for a final roster spot during preseason. Also, now that the alternative is no longer a mid season break, there is less incentive to skip it)
-Now that the Stanley cup is awarded in May, the IIHF can begin a week or 2 back so there is no more overlap.
-Although, it probably still wont be best-on-best, as many players will still choose rest, the Worlds will now have 100% of the hockey focus in North America, and perhaps North America will now have incentive to actually bid on hosting this thing once and a while.
Yep, that's what I would like to see.Back to the original topic. The best option is if the NHL and IIHF partner together and hold a true World Cup once every four years, in February, alternating each time between a North American and European host city. The NHL has shown that they will break in February for international hockey as long as they see a benefit to their league and I think an arrangement like this would benefit all parties.
Yep, that's what I would like to see.
Having it in the U.S exclusively might be a problem though as attendance is likely not going to be very good for games that do not involve the U.S.
Agree with you.The NHL would do what USAH does when hosting the WJHC - just put it in a border city and bank on Canadians making the trek.
I'd like to see an international break every February for WHC/OG and true non-gimmicky World Cup, but the chances of that ever happening are minuscule. but there's no reason why if the WHC tournament were to be held in N. America once in 4, that it couldn't be a dual hosting tournament. Seattle-Vancouver/Detroit Toronto/Montreal Boston. makes sense to me. dependent of course the NHL committing to the Olympics. win-win for everybody involved.
Maybe the NHL/IIHF can make 1 accommodation and once every 4 years host the WHC in N. America in February, and when in Europe, keep it as is, May month is fine with me. I enjoy a little afternoon WHC action as a warmup to that evening's NHL playoff action.
February sounds o.k but I suggest once every four years and it has to be switched between Europe and North America on regular rotation. It can become the new World Cup of hockey, refs also have to be a mix of N.H.L and IIHF guys and with the refs not calling games involving it's own country (to get rid of the howling among European fans over both those issues) who needs the olympics anymore?The NHL would do what USAH does when hosting the WJHC - just put it in a border city and bank on Canadians making the trek.
I'd like to see an international break every February for WHC/OG and true non-gimmicky World Cup, but the chances of that ever happening are minuscule. but there's no reason why if the WHC tournament were to be held in N. America once in 4, that it couldn't be a dual hosting tournament. Seattle-Vancouver/Detroit Toronto/Montreal Boston. makes sense to me. dependent of course the NHL committing to the Olympics. win-win for everybody involved.
Maybe the NHL/IIHF can make 1 accommodation and once every 4 years host the WHC in N. America in February, and when in Europe, keep it as is, May month is fine with me. I enjoy a little afternoon WHC action as a warmup to that evening's NHL playoff action.