ricky0034
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2010
- 15,473
- 7,941
Because that's boring AF.
if the thought of a Nick Ritchie for Darren Helm deal doesn't get your motor going are you even really alive?
Because that's boring AF.
how much could we realistically offer?
Id love to add those pieces but I struggle to see how we could provide the value to land those pieces
Maybe look for a team with a log jam, or take a guy who is a little overpaid?
I would not have minded adding Wennberg even prior to Columbus waiving him. Would have liked him as a free agent too. Something along those lines would be solid in my eyes. I would still be happy with adding TJ, always liked him as a player.
I have seen OEL floated out as on the trade block, I’d at least kick the tires on that. I’d also look into someone like Skjei, Ghost, Hanifin, etc.
Realistic trade targets that wouldn't cost a total fortune and would benefit the Wings, hmm...
Matt Dumba comes to mind. He's actively on the trade block for the Wild but Guerin hasn't liked the offers so far.
26-year-old right shot defender signed at $6 million for the next 3 years. Sounds about perfect for the Wings timeline and needs as they transition Seider and others onto the blueline.
If Hanifin is available, I'd love to see us get in on that. A big, young lefty to play next to Seider and Hronek for the next 5-7 years? Yes, please.
I like Dumba a lot, but he doesn't make much sense unless he's a left side defenseman.
There were 2 types of defenseman I was interested in...
1) A LD to play top 4.
2) A RD to play third pairing, but good enough to bump up and also be our defensive rock when things go south for the kids.
Instead we got Staal, Merril and Stecher.
I don't really mind any of those moves. But they don't answer much for us, hockey-wise.
My trade, still, is get Tyler Johnson for a first.
I have no disagreement to any of this. I made my suggestion with a few parameters.
1) Isn't ancient
2) Is actually good
3) Won't cost a fortune (different than cheap)
4) Is actually on the trade block
Once you filter for those, it's a really small list of guys right now.
And I also operate from the position that prospects, even the good ones, are still unknown quantities at the NHL level, so I don't pencil them into top line roles for the next decade unless they are a generational talent. We've projected up dozens of bluelines with our prospects for the last decade and it's still basically at square one.
So if Dumba, Hronek, and Seider were redundant in 2-3 years... I trade from a position of strength. You're not going to struggle to find a good return for having too many top 4 defenders.
I'd rather have Brodin. Left side. Can pair with one of the rookies to ease them in.
Islanders probably won;t have cap space to sign Greene depending on Barzal's contract. They just put Boychuk on LTIR to make space. They do need another D, but it'd have to be league minimum. Wings could offer up $2 or 3M, the guy has a house in Trenton, he doesn't even need to move.Maybe they should sign, but I'm sure he'll stay at Islanders for cheap. Greene has so long reputation with Lamoriello. He is the "last guy to sign with right caphit until cap with RFAs and LTIR is fixed" -guy.
Vatanen is the player type we are missing. Still Hronek is the only decent PP quarterback. Expect Cholowski to be at Griffs.
This team is boring AF, lol.Because that's boring AF.
the legorocks utube guy suggested Johnson for Z's contract and maybe something plus. I have doubts - but interesting. I have the feeling that TBL's ace in the hole is Stamkos sitting on LTIR until the PO's againThis was a consideration in the summer, but Brodin just signed a 7 year extension with the Wild that includes a no movement clause. He's not going anywhere, so I circled back to the defender available in Dumba.
I still like the Tyler Johnson proposal but it's been covered at length and it seems ownership may not approve? Hard to imagine why it wouldn't be done already otherwise.
the legorocks utube guy suggested Johnson for Z's contract and maybe something plus. I have doubts - but interesting. I have the feeling that TBL's ace in the hole is Stamkos sitting on LTIR until the PO's again
So $11.1M cap/wiggle room w/Z,in the year TB needs it the most, that ought to be worth Cirelli (or equivalent value in 1sts=2) + late 1st 4 yrs of TJ dump + LTIR Z 1yr., they can reload & repeat. Stamkos is LTIR anyday now, so probably moot.the legorocks utube guy suggested Johnson for Z's contract and maybe something plus. I have doubts - but interesting. I have the feeling that TBL's ace in the hole is Stamkos sitting on LTIR until the PO's again
That's the spirit.I'm happy to help Tampa with their cap trouble.
I'm also happy to charge them an arm and a leg in draft capital.
I see absolutely nothing but risk "bringing someone in" right now.
I think that's why you target middle of the road players in a trade. Second pairing defensemen kinda guys, where they're just a 2-3 year placeholder that doesn't break the bank while the kids develop.I'm the opposite. Trading for known performers at the expense of draft picks/prospects feels like the less risky way to get what you want rather than hoping you pick the right player then develop them correctly in the next 5 years.
The big downside is you likely miss out on cost controlled years.
Screw paying assets, just sign Vatanen if possible.I think that's why you target middle of the road players in a trade. Second pairing defensemen kinda guys, where they're just a 2-3 year placeholder that doesn't break the bank while the kids develop.
I would as far as defensemen go trade for Dougie Hamilton. He is still young at 27. We could also sign him as an UFA 2021-2022. Goalie Korpisalo from Columbus. Forward Filip Forsberg Nashville
Luke Witkowski for Adam Erne