If Vegas loses, is it fair to say the Sharks core of the ‘10s is cursed? | Page 2 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

If Vegas loses, is it fair to say the Sharks core of the ‘10s is cursed?

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Congrats to our latest Sportsbook winners - GOLD MEDAL kihei, SILVER MEDAL fish7 and BRONZE MEDAL Sammy Kat - new tournament begins today 6/15
Yeah, but let's be honest, his reputation now is being the ideal player to take you up until a certain point and that's it.
Perry is old and plays only a supporting role. He won the Cup as a young core piece. Isn’t it the core players who determine a club’s success or lack there of, referred to in this thread?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Voight
Perry is old and plays only a supporting role. He won the Cup as a young core piece. Isn’t it the core players who determine a club’s success or lack there of, referred to in this thread?

As a Ducks fan I would argue Perry never won a Cup as a core player. On the 2007 Ducks team he was at BEST the 8th most important player.
 
As a Ducks fan I would argue Perry never won a Cup as a core player. On the 2007 Ducks team he was at BEST the 8th most important player.
He was a member of our young core who was tied for 2nd most points and most even strength points from our Stanley Cup championship team. We still needed him for our Cup win.

1781379566463.png
 
It’s kinda perplexing to me the random irrelevant data points people will assemble to present nothing important.

It’s like finding a random correlation with positioning of the sun to your bowel movements
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buium2Rossi
I don’t recall Herts prime overlapping with Thornton/Marleau/Pavelski/Burns but even if, it’s kind of a useless argument tbh
 
It’s kinda perplexing to me the random irrelevant data points people will assemble to present nothing important.

It’s like finding a random correlation with positioning of the sun to your bowel movements
The change in gravitational attraction pulls it out of you.
 
It’s kinda perplexing to me the random irrelevant data points people will assemble to present nothing important.

It’s like finding a random correlation with positioning of the sun to your bowel movements

Idk man. I ALWAYS poop when the Earth is rotating around the sun, and the moon around the Earth. ALWAYS. Seems fishy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad