member 262271
Guest
That Lou would've signed him quicker, and Hunter would've done something awesome too, etc.If we sign Tavares, I wonder what all the Dubas haters will say.
That Lou would've signed him quicker, and Hunter would've done something awesome too, etc.If we sign Tavares, I wonder what all the Dubas haters will say.
I think Lou going to the Islanders helped both their chances and ours at the same time, if that's even possible - Garth Snow and their current course probably weren't all that attractive as far as winning went, so at least they have a brighter future today than they had a couple months ago in that regard; But Dubas, as the GM of the future for the Leafs, is likely a better person to make the pitch to JT on our behalf than a short-term Lamoriello. Both teams' futures are better off with Lou in New York, I believe, regardless of Tavares' decision.
We already have.
-
If we sign Tavares, I wonder what all the Dubas haters will say.
I don't think Dubas haters exist I think there are those that love him even though all he's really done is sign Carrick, draft some prospects, and trade for a 2020 7th.
And there are of us who are skeptics, we don't hate him but we refuse to celebrate him because he picked up an extra 3rd at the draft.
We want to see him do something real, something that actually matters before we celebrate him, and no winning an AHL title as cool as that is does not qualify.
Get a center, get a D man fill a hole on the roster, THEN he gets credit.
But first he HAS to do something real ,something that actually matters
Who “celebrated” him? Lol
People gave him credit for grabbing an extra asset.
This has been bugging me for a bit now.
If Lou was still a Leaf would it have bettered our chances at signing JT?
I believe it was Lou who didn't want to move Bosak, JVR and Komorov (for picks / prospects we could have moved to improve our D)
Then he leaves, goes to the island and in all likely hood signs JT
Would it have made more sense to let Lou go at the deadline and let Dubas take over or keep Lou for another year and have a better shot at signing JT
The way I see it we lost 3 players, a GM, a scout and potentially the best free agent to ever hit the market and got nothing in return but an unproven GM( I know the marlies won and SSM won but zip at the NHL level)
why waste the money on Tavares when we could have Doughty, dumbo Dubas.
OK but trading 25 for 29 and 76 is something you could have done or I could have done, anybody can do that he doesn't get credit for that, hell Dorion made a similar deal except he got a 2nd.
Before he gets credit he has to do something real, do something that matters.
For example if Tomorrow I see a headline that says "Leafs acqiure Justin Faulk."
THAT is real THAT matters and THAT is something he gets credit for.
Not picking up a 3rd round pick.
My boyhood team mate! And enemies as well.I think he means Lou Franceschetti
So making a trade to get an asset isn’t real?
You already mentioned that the Carrick re-signing doesnt count.
I’m assuming trading our 6th next year for a 6th this year to draft Holmberg doesn’t matter either.
So is it actually only moves that can criticized that are considered “real”
No it doesn't matter, because chances are that 6th round pick never plays in the NHL, and even if he does beat rhe odds and make it you probably wonlt see him until 2024.
I will gladly give him credit when he deserves it and that will happen when he makes a move that impacts the current roster, more specifically the holes in said roster AKA center and defense and Carrick does NOT cut it for defense
Lou is a useless old dinosaur. He is too old school for the modern NHL. Toronto is very lucky to have removed him from the equation.
So, the only moves that matter are ones that add to the main roster?
That’s a dangerous precedent
if Lou was the answer, would he have not signed already? Since his current gm is... Lou?
also im confused at the correlation between a GM of a hockey team and a hockey player. How often you think they interact if at all?
they probably interact enough that it makes a difference. The GM can impose rules on how the players are expected to behave and present themselves, and Lou has extremely traditional ideas. Like any boss, you want the GM to be someone you can get along with.if Lou was the answer, would he have not signed already? Since his current gm is... Lou?
also im confused at the correlation between a GM of a hockey team and a hockey player. How often you think they interact if at all?
Some GM's are pretty active and speak to the players regularly. You can see stuff like that on HBO 24/7. Not all are like that obviously but you'd have to be interested in the day to day, how injuries are coming along etc right from the player/staff.if Lou was the answer, would he have not signed already? Since his current gm is... Lou?
also im confused at the correlation between a GM of a hockey team and a hockey player. How often you think they interact if at all?
The poster has a narrative. Its better to not pay attention to his comments.So, the only moves that matter are ones that add to the main roster?
That’s a dangerous precedent
The poster has a narrative. Its better to not pay attention to his comments.
I think he means Lou Franceschetti
We don't need a Doughty if we're running Matthews, Marner, Nylander, Kadri, Johnsson, Kapanen, etc., especially if we end up landing Tavares - Rielly is as big a name as we need on our blueline in order to be successful, and he's still developing and trending upwards. Between him, Liljegren, Dermott, Zaitsev, Gardiner (or his return), and prospects like Sandin and Durzi in the pipeline, we absolutely have enough bullets in the chamber to grow a Championship-caliber D in the next year or two.which is who exactly? If you think Liljegren, Dermott, Sandin or even Rielly for that matter is the next doughty then idk what to tell you. Rielly is pretty damn good but he's not Doughty and he needs help on the back end
It's also not the fault of Dubas if we don't sign him.If we sign Tavares, I wonder what all the Dubas haters will say.