glucker
Registered User
Would you like to see the A team take all the top guys, and the B team take the left-overs, or would you like to see two balanced teams?
Would you like to see the A team take all the top guys, and the B team take the left-overs, or would you like to see two balanced teams?
With the quality of some top contenders I think we would dilute too much if we sent two balanced teams. As it stands right now we have only a slight advantage over a team like Sweden.
I would rather send one dominant team and then send a "B" team to see if they could compete for a bronze medal on their own.
Hall - Giroux - Seguin
Neal - Thornton -Eberle
J.Skinner - Couture - E.Staal
Lucic - Richards - Marchand
Ladd
Phaneuf -Seabrrok
Giordano - Boyle
M. Staal - Letang
Bernier
MAF
Holtby?
Just spitballing off the top of my head really.
Should be able to use Stamkos for the B team since he wasn't on the A team. Subban should be able to use also since he was scratched every game.
This is a redo situation. Stamkos gets put on Team A.
It'd be awesome, but there'd be so much more pressure on Canada #1. And there are tons of Olympic sports where you compete against your own country, so it's not like its outside of the spirit of the Olympics.
I don't believe there are any team sports that have more than one team from the same country, are there? Maybe curling or something that I'm not aware of.
Is 4-man bobsled considered a team sport? Countries send up to 3 teams for that event.
Curling, on the other hand, only sends one team.
I think the whole idea sending two teams from one country is a bad idea. I know that it's allowed in other events but what if you end up with a Canada vs Canada medal game? It would be pretty lame.
There's a lot of regional qualifying that takes place for the Olympics that we never see here in Canada and the USA with things like hockey, curling etc. If you were to have two Canadian teams, they'd need to both be ranked in the top 9 IIHF rankings to qualify automatically (Which wouldn't happen) or else qualify through play-ins against the other 9 teams.
IIHF only recognizes one team per country, so a Canada B team isn't even a possibility.
Obviously if the IIHF only allows one team per country, this discussion is moot. However, just for fun in a hypothetical situation where you can have more than one team per country, you don't think "Canada B" could qualify ahead of teams like Slovenia, Germany, Norway, etc.?
Even if Canada B had to play and defeat some of those lesser teams to qualify (instead of an automatic berth), you don't think they can do it?
Canada have almost 500 players that played at least 1 game in NHL this season. Slovenia have 150 senior players TOTAL.
Why would be even debatable if Canada B team is better than our NT team?
I'd definitely take the leftovers rather than balancing... you want the best shot at the gold
It would be cool if they did that... the majority of sports allow more than 1 competitor per country. You see a bunch of skiiers or snowboarders from one country that can win multiple medals and you can have Canada 1, Canada 2 and Canada 3 in sports like Bobsleigh.
They wouldn't do it because the tournament doesn't have enough competitors but it would be cool. Sure it might be beneficial to countries like Canada and USA but then again I didn't see people complaining when Russia won gold, silver and bronze in the Men's 50k on the last day of the Olympics.