I need to go on a mini rant about the definition of "all time".

Nogatco Rd

Pierre-Luc Dubas
Apr 3, 2021
2,970
5,543
No. It is not. The term "midget" is derived from the name "Bridget" and so it is today regarded as an emasculating term (hence the perceived offense) when used to refer to a male under 4-feet 4-inches tall regardless of it's definitional correctness. "Midget" is just fine, there's nothing wrong with that word. How will you excuse your faulty statements?
Maybe this sounded more clever in your head before you typed it out
 

Evergreen

____________
Sponsor
May 22, 2008
10,015
2,448
I thought you were going to point out that "all time" includes the future too, and we really don't know whether someone better will come along. So it's kind of a stupid term. We should really be saying someone is the best so far.

But I do agree that it's sort of weird how we diminish playoff statistics when looking back on careers, despite them being arguably more important.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: vadim sharifijanov

Zalos

Berktwad
Feb 2, 2009
2,119
1,642
Quebec
You realize this is how it works in other team sports too? "All-time" is either for the regular season OR the playoffs.

Why would you want to count both together when a bunch of players would be disadvantaged because of the teams they played on during their career?
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
13,003
19,188
You realize this is how it works in other team sports too? "All-time" is either for the regular season OR the playoffs.

Why would you want to count both together when a bunch of players would be disadvantaged because of the teams they played on during their career?

Right, it makes sense on some level, but it is odd how we celebrate 1000 games, 500 goals, etc., but the playoff numbers don’t ever really get any shine until it’s HHOF convo time. Just an example- Selanne was just over ppg over 1451 games (1457 points). “Just” 88 points in 130 playoff games, though, and since we don’t really focus on those numbers we just kinda forget that his style didn’t work in the playoffs as much, or that the numbers aren’t as good at least. We notice stark exceptions, Justin Williams and Joe Thornton, but it’s a bit odd how we largely disregard the stats that get you that cup everyone makes such a big deal out of.

Not really sure what the solution is, just sayin I kinda get OP’s point whilst agreeing with ya that it’s not somethin I’d combine or anything.
 

SoundAndFury

Registered User
May 28, 2012
11,896
5,917
The real pet peeve about records should be win streaks and other winning records with myriad OT wins equating to the records when ties existed.
 

PaulD

71,73,76,77,78,79,86,93
Feb 4, 2016
31,453
18,519
Dundas
Probably cause back in the 80’s and before over half the league was in the postseason but now only half are; even less coming if the league expands which I really hope they don’t.
80s - 16 teams were in play offs
today - 16 teams in play offs
 

Treb

Global Flanderator
May 31, 2011
29,723
30,504
Montreal
There are all-time playoffs records as well. Adding them to the regular season seems like diluting playoff achievements. /thread
 

Anglesmith

Setting up the play?
Sep 17, 2012
46,722
15,128
Victoria
I was actually thinking about exactly this the other day. Hearing that someone has scored 500 NHL goals implies that the number itself is meaningful. But then holding that in your head alongside the knowledge that dozens of the most important goals are being ignored in the count really juxtaposes that.

There are reasons not to count them out of fairness, but realistically we are counting something that is inherently unfair in the first place, so I think the line being drawn is contrived.
 

Fitzy

Very Stable Genius
Jan 29, 2009
35,745
23,049
Wait until the sport has been being played professionally for tens of thousands of years. Who knows if Wayne will even be top 10 then.
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,713
11,280
I don't want to diminish a lot of the milestones that have happened this season already.

  • Malkin 500 goals
  • McDavid 1000 points
  • Oliver Ekman Larsson 1000 games
  • Soon to be Crosby 600 goals
  • Potentially Ovechkin breaking all time goal record.
What we call all time is really just regular season records. Why can't ALL TIME truly be all time and include playoffs as well?

It's just a pet peeve of mine.

How would Ovy have the goal record, if you count both? Wayne has 50 more goals in the playoffs than Ovy does.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad