Hutson, Slaf or Rainmaker?

Who will have the most impactful career?

  • Juraj Slafkovsky

  • Lane Hutson

  • David Reinbacher


Results are only viewable after voting.

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,140
12,315
Reinbacher is the safest bet but Hutson and Slafkovsky have the higher ceilling
I would say Hutson has the lowest ceiling as he will never be a true top pairing dman unless his magic beans kick in and he gets significantly bigger.

Why do so many fans equate upside solely to offence in a vacuum.......it is just wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rve24 and jrom

Team_Spirit

95% Elliotte
Jul 3, 2002
39,688
21,861
We all wanted Lane @ 33 most unanimous pick ever here on HFB

Lucked out at 62 somehow



7xdzjp.jpg


lfg
 

Gillings

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
3,910
2,355
Lol, one season of Juraj at basically 18 and y’all just move on,

Feel bad for your wives, if you have them.

Juraj every day or the week.

Huston is small but brings puck skills and star qualities
Reinbacher brings a very high floor but his ceiling is questionable
Juraj bring a very high ceiling or dominant winger like jagr but his floor is sketchy because of injury history this floor.
 

Paddyjack

Registered User
Dec 10, 2007
3,541
4,162
Sherbrooke
Never thought I'd see a Habs player with a worse nick name than Jiri Sekac's "cakes"...but this "Rainmaker" might beat that out lol :laugh:

To answer the question.

I'll take the player with the highest upside.

Slafkovsky.

Cakes is WAAY worse than Rainmaker lol (but dont get me wrong I'm puzzled by it also)
But the Kotkaniemi nicknames had some doozy's man damn

I don't know, I always thought Cakes was clever, given that it's Sekac in reverse. Similar to Wifi in a way.
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,191
2,680
Oakville, ON
Does it not give pause to anyone that the first overall pick is compared, not only to a 5th overall, but also to a late 2nd rounder?

Sigh.
you could use the same poll with the other top 5 players, and it really doesn;t change the needle (at this point).

Comparing to other draft classes is moot.

The better question becomes: if you had to redo the 2022 draft top 5, who would you pick? reality is it was a very weak year (coming off of Covid). We still have the highest ceiling player in the draft, and as of now still deserves #1.

1) Slaf (#1 redraft) (I had him #4 pre draft)
2) Nemec (#4 redraft) (I had him #2 pre draft)
3) Cooley (#3 redraft) (I had him #5 pre draft)
4) Wright (#5 redraft) (I had him #1 pre draft)
5) Jiriceck (#2 redraft) (I had him #3 pre draft)

Having said the above, I still take Rainmaker as our best asset, then Slaf, then Hutson..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miller Time

Kaiden Ghoul

Youppi va t’il devoir chauser ses patins calvaince
Jan 19, 2020
1,097
842
Slaf, look im not sayin hes the next Rantanen but they play a similar game, if he can become one 75 + points player, we will have our unicorn player

Btw Slaf had better stats in the ligga at the same age, so patience
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabzSauce

Nico Cauzuki

Registered User
Jul 19, 2009
6,574
6,733
King Of The North
I would say Hutson has the lowest ceiling as he will never be a true top pairing dman unless his magic beans kick in and he gets significantly bigger.

Why do so many fans equate upside solely to offence in a vacuum.......it is just wrong.
He can be an elite offensive dman like Hughes so no he doesnt have the lowest ceilling

Kid just broke Brian Leetch record in the ncaa has a freshman
 

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,140
12,315
He can be an elite offensive dman like Hughes so no he doesnt have the lowest ceilling

Kid just broke Brian Leetch record in the ncaa has a freshman

He will never skate like Hughes or Leetch and his upside is as an offensive dman who plays sheltered minutes. Reinbacher is a much better prospect and will likely be far more valuable and have a much bigger impact on winning than Lane likely ever will. Hutson is fun to watch and may turn into a valuable PP/situational weapon but will never be trusted against top players or defending leads ;ate in the game.

Acting like offence is the only measure of upside is such a typical fan generated fallacy.
 

Goldthorpe

Meditating Guru
Jan 22, 2003
5,187
1,147
Montreal
Does it not give pause to anyone that the first overall pick is compared, not only to a 5th overall, but also to a late 2nd rounder?

Sigh.
If instead the poll was about which of these player had the highest upside (becoming the best versions of themselves), I think Slaf would win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,814
58,910
Citizen of the world
Great take here - it hasn't even been one year.

It's been 39 games.

If you think there are legitimate reasons to be dissatisfied with Lafrenière's growth after 3 years....surely you must think it's ridiculous to be dissatisfied with Slafkovsky's growth after 39 games.

Right?


Fair - I exaggerated for effect, but in my defense, I was trying to keep up with you.

Again, this is just a message board man...it's not real life, there's literally NOTHING I could write here that will equate to what you're suggesting here lol

But to address this part, you wrote a lot of stuff which is irrelevant to the point you originally made, which was to suggest that it was bad that a 1st overall pick (picked just over 1 year ago) was being compared a player picked 5th overall 2 months ago and a 67th overall player picked 2 years ago.

I went on to say that Devils fans were calling Nico Hishcer Brendan Morrison not too long ago, Rangers fans have ripped into Alexis Lafrenière and called him a bust, RNH was considered a pretty "meh" 1st overall up until last year.






see threads above...people say things lol and then things change and what those people said doesn't matter anymore.

Just like this thread topic won't matter in the future. It's just another one of thousands of threads here to waste time while we wait for the season to start.

It ain't that deep.
You used idiotic polls that were land slides for Nico for what exactly? People are stupid? These are all very far fetched polls that were closed because it was dumb.

This poll is legitimate. I know Im voting Reinbacher.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,814
58,910
Citizen of the world
Lol you can't ask him that sadly,
He will always revert back to "idc lalala we should of picked the kid that didn't exist."

Whenever that handful of people finally realize that paradox, the better the Slaf threads will be for it lol (Who am I kidding tho)
Logan Cooley, Simon Nemec and David Jiricek would win this poll by a landslide.

What if he’s the fourth best and Hutson’s the fifth best? Is it a success?
Whats fourth best? Does Cooley turn into a 90 pts ppg center? Does Jiricek turn into a norris D? Most likely no.
 

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,471
30,336
Ottawa
You used idiotic polls that were land slides for Nico for what exactly? People are stupid? These are all very far fetched polls that were closed because it was dumb.
To illustrate how it doesn't mean anything.

I mean it's fine to debate and discuss, but to act like the results of these discussions have any bearing on what's happening on the ice is another thing.

This poll is legitimate. I know Im voting Reinbacher.
Nothing wrong with saying Reinbacher.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Estimated_Prophet

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,625
50,027
Logan Cooley, Simon Nemec and David Jiricek would win this poll by a landslide.


Whats fourth best? Does Cooley turn into a 90 pts ppg center? Does Jiricek turn into a norris D? Most likely no.
Okay, let’s say Hutson’s the 3rd best… :laugh: I mean dude, we drafted four guys in that draft who’s probably have gone in the first round in a redraft. And a guy in the 2nd round who might be a top five. I’d say that’s something to be happy about.

Who did you want us to draft at the time? Was it Cooley? Was it Wright?

For what it’s worth, Pronman at The Athletic would still have Slaf number one. I don’t think it’s the “Cooley by a mile” in this poll that you think it is. Slaf’s still got great upside.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Redux91

Habs10Habs

Retired
Sponsor
Aug 22, 2006
60,981
18,740
I know he probably wont be the best player in the draft and thats my problem with it.
You know jack shit lol

Your problem is that he wasn't your personal first choice. Passing judgment on a player, who has yet to complete a full season is beyond ridiculous. Especially when it's been noted by the GM that he is a work in progress. Besides, who are these players that have gone above and beyond to convince you that they are/will be better?

Jiricek
Nemec
Cooley

All of them could be better, but none of them have proven anything yet.
 

Estimated_Prophet

Registered User
Mar 28, 2003
11,140
12,315
Okay, let’s say Hutson’s the 3rd best… :laugh: I mean dude, we drafted four guys in that draft who’s probably have gone in the first round in a redraft. And a guy in the 2nd round who might be a top five. I’d say that’s something to be happy about.

Who did you want us to draft at the time? Was it Cooley? Was it Wright?

For what it’s worth, Pronman at The Athletic would still have Slaf number one. I don’t think it’s the “Cooley by a mile” in this poll that you think it is. Slaf’s still got great upside.

I agree with much of what you are saying but don't quote Pronman, he is an epic moron and his opinion is worthless on a good day lol. Check out his recent article breaking down the Habs top prospects if you want damning evidence. This clown thinks Mysak and Farrell are better skaters than Heineman, Guhle, Caufield, Beck, Barron and Reinbacher etc. He even has Mysak rated well above Engstrom, Mailloux. Kapanen etc. as an over all better prospect. He does this every year and exposes his ineptitude like a dog proudly crapping on your neighbours green carpet because he is certain that it is grass.

Pronman has never been a scout and knows nothing about skating and understands the game at a lower level than I did when I was 12 years old......I am not even joking either, he is an embarrassment and a fraud and should never under any circumstance be cited as a credible source. Wheeler isn't much better either which makes the Athletic's prospect articles painful to read.
 

angusyoung

encountering one suddenly is a natural laxative
Aug 17, 2014
11,830
12,134
Heirendaar
Poked my face here to see what this was about,sorry I did!:laugh:
Don't get it,it'll be years before any actual conclusion can be formed,bored?
I can only see this as an outlet to quibble and stir things up.:nod:

stir-that-shit-stirring.gif
 

Ezpz

No mad pls
Apr 16, 2013
15,308
11,809
Slaf, look im not sayin hes the next Rantanen but they play a similar game, if he can become one 75 + points player, we will have our unicorn player

Btw Slaf had better stats in the ligga at the same age, so patience
We will see. Rantanen exploded after being drafted and was over a point per game in the AHL in his D+1. Slaf had the worst rookie season of a first overall pretty much in history. I wouldn't write him off but I think we should be grateful if he even becomes a 60 point guy. Rantanen really is an exceptional playmaker and I don't see those skills in Slaf. He's been a shooter pretty much since he was a kid. That limits the number of points you can put up if your shot is your only weapon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrb1p

Scriptor

Registered User
Jan 1, 2014
7,897
4,875
you could use the same poll with the other top 5 players, and it really doesn;t change the needle (at this point).

Comparing to other draft classes is moot.

The better question becomes: if you had to redo the 2022 draft top 5, who would you pick? reality is it was a very weak year (coming off of Covid). We still have the highest ceiling player in the draft, and as of now still deserves #1.

1) Slaf (#1 redraft) (I had him #4 pre draft)
2) Nemec (#4 redraft) (I had him #2 pre draft)
3) Cooley (#3 redraft) (I had him #5 pre draft)
4) Wright (#5 redraft) (I had him #1 pre draft)
5) Jiriceck (#2 redraft) (I had him #3 pre draft)

Having said the above, I still take Rainmaker as our best asset, then Slaf, then Hutson..
Rainmaker will be an extremely important, stabilizing element.I'm not comparing him to Weber as a player, per se, but he will have similar impact on the room and on the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh

Kaiden Ghoul

Youppi va t’il devoir chauser ses patins calvaince
Jan 19, 2020
1,097
842
We will see. Rantanen exploded after being drafted and was over a point per game in the AHL in his D+1. Slaf had the worst rookie season of a first overall pretty much in history. I wouldn't write him off but I think we should be grateful if he even becomes a 60 point guy. Rantanen really is an exceptional playmaker and I don't see those skills in Slaf. He's been a shooter pretty much since he was a kid. That limits the number of points you can put up if your shot is your only weapon.

Not saying he will put 100 points but they play similar style

75 points player who goes to the net while bringing physical aspect would be good, the more the better
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,814
58,910
Citizen of the world
You know jack shit lol

Your problem is that he wasn't your personal first choice. Passing judgment on a player, who has yet to complete a full season is beyond ridiculous. Especially when it's been noted by the GM that he is a work in progress. Besides, who are these players that have gone above and beyond to convince you that they are/will be better?

Jiricek
Nemec
Cooley

All of them could be better, but none of them have proven anything yet.
My problem ? My choice was Wright and I can confidently say it was as wrong as Slaf, maybe even more. Completing a season or not doesn't change much development wise, age is not suspended because he doesn't play in the NHL. Im 30 years old, not 18 because I've never played pro hockey, lol. Jiricek, Nemec and Cooley have separated themselves from Slaf, Wright and Gauthier and Id say Gauthier has proved he could be every bit as good as Slaf and Wright.

Okay, let’s say Hutson’s the 3rd best… :laugh: I mean dude, we drafted four guys in that draft who’s probably have gone in the first round in a redraft. And a guy in the 2nd round who might be a top five. I’d say that’s something to be happy about.

Who did you want us to draft at the time? Was it Cooley? Was it Wright?

For what it’s worth, Pronman at The Athletic would still have Slaf number one. I don’t think it’s the “Cooley by a mile” in this poll that you think it is. Slaf’s still got great upside.

I seriously doubt Hutson will be top 5, but even so, why couldn't we want more ? Why couldn't we aim for the actual best player for the 1OA ?

And why are we giving them so much credit for passing over a better player than Slaf twice if thats the stone were laying ? Slafs still got great upside and I still dream of him being Rantanen, but can someone tell me confidently he will be even close to that ?
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,625
50,027
I agree with much of what you are saying but don't quote Pronman, he is an epic moron and his opinion is worthless on a good day lol. Check out his recent article breaking down the Habs top prospects if you want damning evidence. This clown thinks Mysak and Farrell are better skaters than Heineman, Guhle, Caufield, Beck, Barron and Reinbacher etc. He even has Mysak rated well above Engstrom, Mailloux. Kapanen etc. as an over all better prospect. He does this every year and exposes his ineptitude like a dog proudly crapping on your neighbours green carpet because he is certain that it is grass.

Pronman has never been a scout and knows nothing about skating and understands the game at a lower level than I did when I was 12 years old......I am not even joking either, he is an embarrassment and a fraud and should never under any circumstance be cited as a credible source. Wheeler isn't much better either which makes the Athletic's prospect articles painful to read.
Beside the point. People are going to disagree on this stuff. There’s no consensus on who should’ve been 1 st overall right now. It’s far too early to say.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad