Fair enough.
Let's assume this is true.
The goal of sex ed in public schools is: to prepare horny teens so that if they do engage in sexual activities, they do it in a safe way that doesn't result in an STI or pregnancy or hospital trip, right? I think that's a fair statement of objective.
And this is in a context where everyone has a magic box in their pocket that can show them all the internet porn. All of it. At any time. A modern teenagers first sexual experience is highly likely to be through this magic box.
So on the one hand, we have a program whose goal is to get yutes through their teenage years without a trip to the ER, and on the other hand, a world where said yutes are going to be exposed to a wide variety of sexual acts via the magic box.
Conclusion: those sex acts need to be contextualized.
Tossing salad is a good example. It's common in videos (or so I've been told
), and if you don't wash beforehand, you might get a parasite. So for the love of God please, if you're going to do it, wash up first.
So that's not Obama being divisive, that's "the media"?