How much would you like to have your team spending on a starting goaltender?

[JaegerDice]

Goalies are the backbone of the NHL, say it.

I wont because I disagree completely.

I sympathize with goalies because I feel they’re given outsized blame for a team’s failure. It’s proven again and again that teams are better off investing in players that contribute to suppressing shots against than they are investing in goalies that can stop a slightly greater number of the shots that get through.

 

[Coffees]

l

I sympathize with goalies because I feel they’re given outsized blame for a team’s failure

Hey i can appreciate that.

Cheers and uh sorry for bringing up an old argument

 

[JaegerDice]

Hey i can appreciate that.

Cheers and uh sorry for bringing up an old argument

Haha, I've been responding to this thread on my phone, and I didn't even register to me that your profile pic was of a goalie.

 

[Howboutthempanthers]

I'd say 6 million.
Goalies are as good as the team structure in front of them. There are outliners here and there. But the teams winning cups play good structured team defense. Relying on your goaltending to be extra special is not a formula for winning cups.
And yes I know we won with Bob. But the fact the he struggled when he first got here, behind a team that was poor defensively, helps my point. The team turns into an elite defensive team.... boom, Vezina nomination.

 

[frisco]

64 million.

My Best-Carey

 

[AlwaysSunnyInDetroit]

boston fans all agree that 8x$9.5m in addition to trading top assets is a fair price to pay for unproven goaltending