T REX
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 10,845
- 8,208
McDavid playing for the Oilers or McDavid is he was on the Leafs?
Oilers - 127
Leafs - 259
Oilers - 127
Leafs - 259
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerAlso the elimination of the red line.Crosby, Malkin, and Ovechkin's production curve is probably a bit strange just by virtue of how different officiating was when they first came into the league. They all entered the league at an obstruction-free time that has gradually degraded more and more as the years have gone on. If they were playing healthy seasons (unfortunately less common for Crosby and Malkin) in a mid/late 2000s style game, they'd probably be putting up the same or better numbers as their first few years, tbh.
Sometimes I wonder what McDavid would've done between like 05-08. They probably would have had to just stop calling penalties at some point or his team would be on the PP for half the game.
I think 140+ is prob right with maybe a 150-160 sprinkled in... just because the game is headed this way
I know he's only 21 but the other "generational" superstars that have come into the league recently have been topping out in point production at around that same age. Crosby, Malkin, and Ovechkin all had their highest point totals by the time they were 22 which McDavid will be this season. I think he could reach 120 with an outside shot at 130 but each year he doesn't hit those numbers the likelihood of a career year diminishes.
It's typically the less hyped superstars that come into the league that come into the league and are eased in a bit that top out in their mid 20s.
Crosby would've had 125 ish at his peak so probably higher.
I wish the NHL did better tracking of scoring chances.
He gets about 22-25 shifts per game. creates about 20-30 scoring chances per game, and i would say about 15 high-danger scoring chances.
about 1.3 of those leads to a goal.
Then he has those weird games like he went off on Hedman last year where everything goes right.
I don't think he can really create more offence than he does already. Really his linemates having better finish is all he needs.
He can get to 50 goals all by himself. And really playing with Nuge this year thats a no-brainer.
If everything went perfect all year i would say 165 would be the max. (he tends to play in 30 game stretches each year at 2 ppg, but over the season obviously not. I would say 130 is entirely possible. I could also see a scenario where he only gets 110 but is a way better player. (Like he makes his usual unreal plays but the linemates are used more effectively and he doesn't get the assist in-spite of making the play)
There were almost double the amount of PP's awarded back then and over half his 120 points came on the PP where he played with guys like Gonchar one hell of a PP quarterback, and guys like Recchi and Malkin. So more than half of his points scored were with a man or more advantage playing with guys that are the exact opposite of scrubs.Crosby's peak would have been just over 130 (twas the year he went like 30+ games in a row with a point before getting concussed and missing half the year). I can see McDavid reaching 130 with a PP and better linemates, I mean Crosby put up 120 playing with scrubs in 06-07 (though he had a ****ton of PP points).
McDavid will continue to improve, but teams will also learn to defend him better, ie. the Flames who 95% of the time don't know what the **** to do with McDavid.
Look at how "mediocre" he was before they were eliminated from the playoffs, Gaudreau was ahead of him for points for 70% of the year. McDavid took off the last 5-6 weeks. Even Crosby going for 130 was half way through the year, maybe he slows down.
If McDavid is going to have a 130+ campaign he needs to be consistent for 82 games and it's almost impossible to happen. Kuch and Stammer last year were on pace for insane numbers and they both tapered off hard and both players are no slouches.
Here is what we know.
-McDavid produced at about the same pace, relative to the league, in 16/17 as he did in 17/18 while his team's PP clicked at a 5th best rate. He did not lap the field that year as you are expecting he would if only the PP was better. The PP was better in 16/17.
According to HFOilers fans, 400pts, adjusted for 500pts, adjusted gain for about 750.
IN THE FIRST HALF!
That shade of green looks great on you.![]()
I think this coming year he’s going to score 50 goals and be at least close to 120 points. Would have happened this year if not for the team having the worst PP% and the least amount of PP’s. Career year he could break into the 140 point range.
Are you saying prime McDavid is close to prime Mario?When Lemieux came back in the early 2000s he put up 137 points in his first 82 games in an era of stifling defensive systems and similar goals per game as today.
I don’t think that McDavid in his prime is going to be far off from Lemieux ...130 points could be the lower end of his best scoring range. 140+ may even be a possibility. McDavid may become the best offensive player since Lemieux-such astounding abilities.