Not a chance. Goalies and defensemen are much better now and Gretzky wasn’t a physical specimen to take over like McDavid.I think his average season would be 100+ assists and 50+ goals.
His numbers would be similar to Kucherov+
Not a chance. Goalies and defensemen are much better now and Gretzky wasn’t a physical specimen to take over like McDavid.I think his average season would be 100+ assists and 50+ goals.
It's hard to articulate but it always looks like Gretzky "thought" his way to goals.Curious where people get these sub 40G predictions. This is the guy with the 2nd highest goal total and the highest single goal record in the NHL.
What does that make the other best goal scorers during those eras? 20g guys? 15g guys?
Do you really think Thompson, Guentzel, Connor, JT Miller, etc are better goal scorers than Gretzky?
Crazy talk
What is this? Hockey IQ and desire/drive is not era dependant.Who knows. Even with modern training and equipment I doubt he would be as legendary as he ended up being. Put him on a mid team and he'd still be great, but not historically great. Mario on the other hand would totally kill it in the current era, healthy of course. His game, skill set, and size were not as era-dependent as that of Gretzky.
Not nearly to the same extent as before. Even the Dmen mostly just wrist it on goal from the point. One timers sure, but even those are less telegraphed with shorter windups.The slapper is used all of the time on the power play along the half wall, and the smartest player the game has ever seen would find a way to create space to get off the necessary shot, its what he excelled at.
Yes, and the smartest player to ever play the game would figure it out.Not nearly to the same extent as before. Even the Dmen mostly just wrist it on goal from the point. One timers sure, but even those are less telegraphed with shorter windups.
Just look at the amount of slapper goals in today's game. You just don't see it that much, used to be very common. The times have changed, sports evolve etc.
Never said he wouldn'tYes, and the smartest player to ever play the game would figure it out.
Butterfly goaltending was around since the 70s. His goal scoring really dropped as he aged like most players do and some pretty nasty injuries
We’re talking about a guy with the histories best hockey IQ. I’m sure with modern training, he’s scored a hell of a lot of goals.
At age 36 and 37 he was playing in the dead-puck era, and finished top four in the scoring race in both seasons. Compare that to Crosby.Not a chance. Goalies and defensemen are much better now and Gretzky wasn’t a physical specimen to take over like McDavid.
His numbers would be similar to Kucherov+
Now he played in the 70's?Half his goalscoring highlight reel is 5’8 in skates stand up goalies falling down the second he crosses the blue line. I’m sure he’d adapt to modern goalies but please let’s not pretend like goaltending was a serious discipline in the 70s, it’s painful to watch.
The two slappers scored with in this video could still easily be executed in today's game if you know how to create room for yourself and know your angles. He's 37 here.Never said he wouldn't
Sure it wasn’t good. But that applies to everyone during that era. If you think Gretzky is dropping down to 30-35 goals like some have predicted, then that makes players like Trottier, what, 15g guy today?Half his goalscoring highlight reel is 5’8 in skates stand up goalies falling down the second he crosses the blue line. I’m sure he’d adapt to modern goalies but please let’s not pretend like goaltending was a serious discipline in the 70s, it’s painful to watch.
No, time machines are not a thing. He'd enjoy the same opportunities today's athletes do, and still have the best mind for the game and the same desire and will to winIf it's just him plopped into 2005-06 to play his career? (disregarding which team and teammates he'd be with)
you are dead wrong on fitness....he was known to have cardio superior to most athletes out there, no matter what sport. And the way penalties are called today he would have a real winger other than Semenko as a third linemate., Possible his points totals could be even higherHe’d have the hockey sense to dominate in any era, but he wouldn’t be strong enough to last in today’s NHL.
Perhaps modern day training would bulk him up, but who knows if an extra 20 lbs. of muscle would slow him down.
Even back then he wasn’t a particularly great physical specimen. They used to joke that he consistently finished dead last on the Oilers during strength and fitness tests, but he had so much skill that he overcame this weakness. In today’s NHL I don’t know if he still would. Just like in today’s NHL, Bobby Orr wouldn’t seem quite so fast, and Bobby Hull’s slapshots would get blocked most of the time.
That’s the sad reality of professional sports...the game doesn’t always get better, in fact sometimes it gets worse, but the players continuously get better.
hahahahaThere’s no chance Gretzky would outperform McDavid.
He would be, but by how much? It doesn’t work linearly like you think.This question tends to come up six months or so, and the answer is always that he'd be the favorite to win the Art Ross every season. The difference is that the separation from his peers would be smaller than in the past. The talent level is higher, but Gretzky would be a better shooter, passer, skater, puck handler, and more athletic, had he grown up today with current hockey programs, nutrition, and fitness.
Patrick Roy, Ed Belfour, Martin Brodeur, Domenic Hasek were awful? Kirk McLean? Curtis Joesph?No disrespect to Gretzky but the NHL actually has talented players all through the line up who are night and day more in shape than ever.
Gretzky wouldn’t be better than McDavid. Pretty comfortable saying that. Gretzky was up against pack a day kind of guys nonstop. Professional sports back in his time wasn’t as serious in terms of training as it is now. Goalies were awful then too.