Houston vs Quebec City

Next expansion team

  • Houston

    Votes: 82 63.6%
  • Quebec City

    Votes: 47 36.4%

  • Total voters
    129

Mirka the Turka

Jesus loves you
Oct 20, 2022
1,131
1,949
Where should the NHL expand to next?

I go with Houston: More people, better economy, less taxes, and its another team in the best state in the USA, Texas. Texas, for its size and scope, deserves 2 NHL teams. The NHL wins in every category with Houston over QC.
 

Killer Orcas

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
8,240
6,453
Abbotsford BC
Quebec deserves it but Houston will get it before them. The Nords fans will have to wait most likely for a relocation as they need teams for the western conference before adding more in east.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,930
8,568
Wherever the people offering a billion dollars in bribes expansion fees want a team.
 

Kairi Zaide

Unforgiven
Aug 11, 2009
105,336
12,889
Quebec City
Quebec deserves it but Houston will get it before them. The Nords fans will have to wait most likely for a relocation as they need teams for the western conference before adding more in east.
Besides just "waiting" and "hoping", Quebec hasn't really done anything to be "deserving". The economy isn't that great. It's not as desirable a city to live in as other cities in the league, which will make it hard to attract and retain talented players to stay competitive. Attendance will go down drastically if the team starts struggling for a few years. It would end up being the 2nd smallest market, only beating Winnipeg. Good luck finding anyone willing to drop the $1B+ to acquire a team too. I wouldn't be surprised if this required governmental subsidies for it to happen, and nobody will want their taxes into that.

There are far better options out there for relocation and expansion.
 

Primary Assist

The taste of honey is worse than none at all
Jul 7, 2010
6,063
6,087
Logic dictates Houston, emotion dictates Quebec City. As a modern man who is in touch with his emotions, I say "bonjour le Quebec!" and "what the hell is a couche-tard?"
 

cc

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
10,017
1,908
I would like it to be Quebec City but I think it's a foregone conclusion it will be Houston
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,193
14,655
Kansas City, MO
This is a pretty cool concept. Houston is a no-brainer to me if we are talking 34 or some future relocation. Both Houston and QC would be on my wishlist for a 36-team league.

Houston Aeros - NHL Brand Concept

5zvoS3s.png

jknjy1W.png
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,023
11,232
Where should the NHL expand to next?

I go with Houston: More people, better economy, less taxes, and its another team in the best state in the USA, Texas. Texas, for its size and scope, deserves 2 NHL teams. The NHL wins in every category with Houston over QC.
Houston issue right now is the NBA owner Fertitta as he holds the arena management agreement with the Toyota Center. No other NHL team is the tenant to an NBA controlled arena. Nashville is a tenant to the city/county run Bridgestone Arena for example.
So, he has to agree to pay the price the NHL wants for a team. He's been public in the past about his opinions that NHL clubs are overvalued (esp. in the south).

Someone else has to come in and look to build another arena in a different county. Question is whether there is a location and county that makes sense to do that. So, we wait.

We know the NHL wants back in ATL, AZ, and into HOU. 4th and final spot is open. But, does QC have enough corporate support as we saw Win's corporate support fall off drastically post Covid. Regular fans can only buy so many tickets. Need the corps to step up all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG

maskingagent

Registered User
Oct 18, 2016
124
61
There will be no Canadian Expansion for as long as the value of the Canadian dollar is, compared to the US. This could be years, could be decades, even longer ? The low Canadian dollar is the main reason, simply put. The other reason is the "smaller population centers" in those Canadian cities cannot sustain an NHL franchise over a span of years.
 

biturbo19

Registered User
Jul 13, 2010
27,225
12,369
I voted Quebec City out of spite, purely based on the kind of annoying tone of the original question.


I think this is a more complicated question than the poll is likely to represent though. Quebec City is arguably the more stable and "deserving" hockey market. But from the NHL perspective...it has very negligible upside. That market is already being served and engaged in hockey watching by existing franchises. It's also a puny TV market that would have next to no impact on the all important TV deals.

Houston is dumb as a "hockey market"...but it's an enormous TV market, rapidly growing and huge as an actual population base with shifting demographics, and it represents a huge amount of almost "pure upside" in terms of generating actually new or novel revenue streams. Which is what the NHL actually cares about.


But that's where it comes down to a more complicated question of...which is better For the NHL vs which is the Better/More Deserving Hockey Market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bert

BCNate

Registered User
Apr 3, 2016
3,354
3,353
The league strategy says Houston but I say Québec.

A second Texas team I'd rather see in Austin.
I think Austin would be a very good market as well. NHL teams tend to do well in less saturated sports markets. Almost half the league plays in a city with only 1 or 2 teams in the big four leagues.
 

Nogatco Rd

Pierre-Luc Dubas
Apr 3, 2021
2,822
5,276
I think Austin would be a very good market as well. NHL teams tend to do well in less saturated sports markets. Almost half the league plays in a city with only 1 or 2 teams in the big four leagues.
Interesting, that’s a good point. Seems like Austin has a lot of civic/cultural pride there too, I could see them really embracing a team.

How well do the Texas Stars draw?
 

Rafafouille

Registered User
May 12, 2015
1,599
1,829
QC
Want? Quebec

What will happen? Houston

What should happen? Houston


It makes no financial sense to put a team in Quebec City. Too low of a population, not much of a private sector economy, not much TV market gains to be made and the arena would probably end up like Winnipeg, struggling to sell out and like Winnipeg, we'd start to hear threats of moving the team again eventually because people can't afford to go 41 nights a year.
 

No Fun Shogun

34-38-61-10-13-15
May 1, 2011
57,515
15,329
Illinois
Whichever has someone willing to pay a billion dollars for an expansion team.

So Houston, allegedly. I'd love to see Quebec City get a team back, but they were seemingly priced out over a half billion dollars ago.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad