Proposal: Horvat for Kane 50% and a 1st

[Syckle78]

He's also making 7mil in a league where no one has cap space because of the flat cap and the fact that contracts are ridiculous now. It's not purely a matter of character issues, even if those are significant.

That's just not true. There are plenty of teams with cap space that passed on him. Teams that could desperately use a productive player for free.

 

[Pavelski2112]

That's just not true. There are plenty of teams with cap space that passed on him. Teams that could desperately use a productive player for free.

Teams that probably know that the Sharks are willing to retain in a trade and didn't want to take on all 7mil at once. I have a feeling this isn't over yet.

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

You grossly over-value Kane at 50% and your 1st round pick. Horvat cost way more then that joke of an offer.

 

[YP44]

so there are reports of a divide in the Canucks room and you think the answer is Evander Kane?

 

[Cas]

My yearly trade offer to flamed by those who I flame

Kane @50% with a 1st to Vancouver for Horvat

Why might this trade work? Both fan bases will hate it( that is usually a good starting point)

Why Vancouver does this trade? They need to do something in the room and it sounds like Horvat is on the wrong side of the room. Kane brings a headache but the first softens the blow if the buy him out in the off season

Why does San Jose do it? They lose Kane's headache and gain a two way forward who up to now was very reliable and dependable for an all around game

the 50%? no team will touch Kane at full price.


FLAME AWAY

Rather just buy out Kane and keep a top-ten pick.

 

[Tempo]

only on HF boards would a player who has consistently put up 65+ PPGe over the last 5 seasons have "negative value"

and you wonder why the people that matter call us "ass clowns"

The only ass clown here is the one that ignores all his off ice issues.

 

[Pinkfloyd]

OP indicates Vancouver would simply buy him out

If Vancouver is trading him simply for the buyout then San Jose is including TWO 1st round picks.

that's 6 years of dead cap with 3 of those years averaging about $4 million for the next 3

Not when it's at 50%. Sharks would eat half the buyout too.

 

[EP to Kuzmenko]

Bolded is not accurate - Media say shit because they want hits and likes, but this has been shot down by players, coaches, agents, etc.

Miller confirmed that he and Bo are working through problems.

 

[Pia8988]

Sharks aren't getting anything useful from Kane. Kane at 50% for a player to be named later is the value.

 

[supsens]

Sharks aren't getting anything useful from Kane. Kane at 50% for a player to be named later is the value.

They are not moving that contract

 

[Kakkoforpresident]

Absolutely nobody wants Kane. His value is 0.00%. He will not play in the NHL again

 

[Canadian Canuck]

Bahahaha this is brutal.

 

[Gurglesons]

Even if Kane wasn't a head case this is an absolute steal for the Sharks.

 

[Boondock]

Miller confirmed that he and Bo are working through problems.

I read otherwise - When did Miller confirm this?
"They're good friends": Green denies Horvat-Miller divide in Canucks room | Offside

 

[ole ole]

It would be stupid to ask that question. The Sharks aren't giving up a first to get rid of Kane.

And the Nucks sure as hell are not trading Horvat for Kane and a 1st even if Kane came with 100% retention if it was possible.

 

[Pinkfloyd]

And the Nucks sure as hell are not trading Horvat for Kane and a 1st even if Kane came with 100% retention if it was possible.

Didn't say they were. If Vancouver is supposedly looking to move a cancer, they aren't going to bring one in.

 

[Donuts]

take out kane and horvat and just make it

SJ 1st for benning and green

 

[themelkman]

If the sharks were better sure. Our first is still likely lottery so no

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

only on HF boards would a player who has consistently put up 65+ PPGe over the last 5 seasons have "negative value"

and you wonder why the people that matter call us "ass clowns"

Being a total POS has ramifications like having negative value and that's not even considering his big cap hit and finally if this wasn't true your team wouldn't have waived him would they?

 

[CanadienShark]

Our 2022 1st? No chance. Not risking gifting Vancouver a lottery pick. If we could put top 10 protection, maybe, but then I'm nervous about the next draft.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Miller confirmed that he and Bo are working through problems.

No he didn't.

 

[Bizz]

People are seriously on this forum pretending that the sole reason why Kane was waived was because of his behavior and not because he needed a conditioning stint. It's pretty funny.

The only reason why nobody claimed him is the same reason teams don't offersheet RFAs. It would've been a classless gesture that only scumbag teams like Carolina would have pulled.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

People are seriously on this forum pretending that the sole reason why Kane was waived was because of his behavior and not because he needed a conditioning stint. It's pretty funny.

The only reason why nobody claimed him is the same reason teams don't offersheet RFAs. It would've been a classless gesture that only scumbag teams like Carolina would have pulled.

 

[The Moose is Loose]

only on HF boards would a player who has consistently put up 65+ PPGe over the last 5 seasons have "negative value"

and you wonder why the people that matter call us "ass clowns"

Kane doesn't have negative value due to his on ice play.
Please tell me you're not ignorant enough to believe that is the reason

 

[wavaxa2]

I am not sure that decimating already questionable center depth for another winger really helps the Canucks.