You guys are nuts using BGS. It's PSA or SGC.
I have an Auston Mathews YG on UD ePack. I'm transferring it to COMC and then asking them to send it to BGS for grading.
PSA top grade is PSA 10. Price-wise for a Young Guns like Auston Matthews, a BGS 9.5 is above $250 (US) and a PSA 10 is $350+.
Last BGS 10 sold on eBay went for $1300, about almost a grand more than PSA 10. There are no BGS 10 Black for Matthews YGs recently sold. It wouldn't surprise me if the first one available for sale this year would net close to $5000, more than 10x a PSA 10.
A McDavid YG BGS 10 recently sold for $4500+. A McDavid YG BGS 10 Black sold for nearly $13,000. PSA 10 goes for a little under $1200.
In hockey, the number one card that is graded, by far, is Young Guns. And by far, these are sent to be graded to BGS, if a submitter can deal with the submission time. (BGS 10 Black is a BGS graded card that not only garnered a 10 grade overall, every single sub-grade is also 10, for a "perfect" card. )
If it's me, the chance to hit a BGS 10 or even a Black, I'd rather submit to BGS any new card, such as Young Guns, that looks good to the eye. In new hockey collecting, we don't really consider PSA as a serious company. PSA is really the company when we get our BGS submissions back as 9.5, we re-sub to PSA and hope for a PSA 10.
The only way PSA really catches on, and it could, is if people started to collect Young Guns sets for set registry and want all PSA 10s. That's both a realistic course and a viable collecting path. However, knowing how hockey collectors are wired, they would much rather collect certain players and just have a decent, raw collection of ungraded Young Guns in a set and not care about PSA 10 collections.
Something about O Pee Chee and it's crappy cutting/production seems to keep the vintage collectors from caring as much about grading and PSA. Grading seems to be all about Young Guns and SPA Future Watches instead. PSA seems to be made more for Topps than OPC or UD.