LGB
Registered User
- Feb 4, 2019
- 2,536
- 2,773
I’ll take the guy who is more than 1.5 years younger, outproduced him, and was one of the best players at the WJC as an 18 year old.Not even the best player from his line that is still eligible
I’ll take the guy who is more than 1.5 years younger, outproduced him, and was one of the best players at the WJC as an 18 year old.Not even the best player from his line that is still eligible
I am sure you would.I’ll take the guy who is more than 1.5 years younger, outproduced him, and was one of the best players at the WJC as an 18 year old.
I guess when I say “men” I mean playing against bigger and more developed players. In the end im just basing it on the fact that we have more big name prospects coming out of ncaa (by quite a bit) than ever before, as I remember reading last month.Well the question for Hutson wasn't ever his talent or ability to produce, it was his ability to play his position at his size.
On average Hockey East players are about 1.2 years older than WHL based on the numbers I saw. Not sure how one is men and one is kids unless you're speaking about the WC which I think he did show well at.
Also not clamoring for Korchinski to be taken.
For me, I think Hutson's outcome(s) as a prospect are too vast to be considered at this stage. But its all a matter of opinion which is what makes it fun.I guess when I say “men” I mean playing against bigger and more developed players. In the end im just basing it on the fact that we have more big name prospects coming out of ncaa (by quite a bit) than ever before, as I remember reading last month.
Knies should go soonWhen do players that are actually NHLers, like Knies and Greig, start making the cut, over guys that are still pure perceptions?