GDT: HFBoards GDT | 3/2/16

Status
Not open for further replies.

gallagt01

Registered User
Jun 10, 2006
14,753
2,659
Sloan
Apparently you can run a goaltender if you are on a O6 team.

Gallagher certainly didn't mean to hit Gibson, but you can't allow him to do something like that without penalizing him. It was a stupid play for him to try and cut between Gibson and the net.
 

SAADfather

Registered User
Dec 12, 2014
5,275
152
And if you are watching and not listening to Eddie O you would see that every team in the league, including the Hawks do the exact same thing

The idea that is is just the Red Wings who "have been getting away for this for some 25 years" (an ACTUAL Eddie O Quote) is laughable.

Not saying no one else interferes ever, Its just the Redwings did that more often and better than anyone else in the NHL. It literally has nothing to do with Eddie O. Anyone with hockey knowledge can see that. But if blaming Eddie O makes you feel better about getting embarrassed at home have at it.
 

LarKing

Registered User
Sep 2, 2012
11,958
4,896
Michigan
The Redwings did that more often and better than anyone else in the NHL. It literally has nothing to do with Eddie O. Anyone with hockey knowledge can see that. But if blaming Eddie O makes you feel better about getting embarrassed at home, have at it.

Would you like to back that up with some kind of proof?
 

SAADfather

Registered User
Dec 12, 2014
5,275
152
Would you like to back that up with some kind of proof?

Is this serious? Are you expecting me to actually go back and sift threw countless hours of Redwings hockey to pick out every subtle interference they got away with?
 

The Toews Era*

Registered User
Nov 29, 2014
3,605
1
Is this serious? Are you expecting me to actually go back and sift threw countless hours of Redwings hockey to pick out every subtle interference they got away with?

No no, cunning genius eddie o unfairly mistreated the red wings for years, then legitimized it by calling out toews in year 8. What a mastermind
 

LarKing

Registered User
Sep 2, 2012
11,958
4,896
Michigan
Is this serious? Are you expecting me to actually go back and sift threw countless hours of Redwings hockey to pick out every subtle interference they got away with?

Oh sorry excuse me for wanting proof rather than baseless accusations.
 

LarKing

Registered User
Sep 2, 2012
11,958
4,896
Michigan
2013 calder cup champions may be worse

Are we insulting my avatar now? Damn you guys are relentless :laugh:

I stole it from a wings poster a few years back and never changed it out of laziness. Off topic but I don't really think that was a bad comeback at the time considering how many nhl players that 2013 team produced.
 

LarKing

Registered User
Sep 2, 2012
11,958
4,896
Michigan

The Toews Era*

Registered User
Nov 29, 2014
3,605
1
Are we insulting my avatar now? Damn you guys are relentless :laugh:

I stole it from a wings poster a few years back and never changed it out of laziness. Off topic but I don't really think that was a bad comeback at the time considering how many nhl players that 2013 team produced.

I know. Was just joking.
 

SAADfather

Registered User
Dec 12, 2014
5,275
152
Oh sorry excuse me for wanting proof rather than baseless accusations.

Prove that it isn't true.

It's not a baseless accusation at all. Thats actually kinda funny. It's not like this is some kind of mystery that just got uncovered tonight...
 

LarKing

Registered User
Sep 2, 2012
11,958
4,896
Michigan
Prove that it isn't true.

It's not a baseless accusation at all. Thats actually kinda funny. It's not like this is some kind of mystery that just got uncovered tonight...

It's generally on the person making the original statement to provide proof/reasoning but sure you got me here. I just believe the Wings have this reputation in the same way they had/have the "ref wings" reputation. A person or few people made the comment and HF posters love to blame things on anything but their team after a loss similar to how everyone loves to blame the refs. Have you watched the Wings recently though? You saw them tonight. We're really not that good at subtle interference. I wish we were better honestly. I see teams pretty consistently outdo us in that regard so it's puzzling how we're still the team that has the major reputation for it.
 

JT Kreider

FIRE GORDIE CLARK
Dec 24, 2010
16,903
15,465
NYC
Wow the Habs are up 1-0 against the Ducks. The same Habs team that got blown out 6-2 in SJ. The same Ducks team that has won 9 straight. Hockey is weird.
 

HuGo Sham

MR. CLEAN-up ©Runner77
Apr 7, 2010
28,629
20,957
Montreal
Our Muppet coach is now forced to play the young guys. No Desharnais in the lineup is huge That goal was all McCarron and finished by galchenyuk, who even when not playing center is on pace for 25. yeah no, he aint a bust. fire therrien

mcCarron is going to be an important piece for habs. he's a 6'6 240 pound gallagher
 

SAADfather

Registered User
Dec 12, 2014
5,275
152
It's generally on the person making the original statement to provide proof/reasoning but sure you got me here. I just believe the Wings have this reputation in the same way they had/have the "ref wings" reputation. A person or few people made the comment and HF posters love to blame things on anything but their team after a loss similar to how everyone loves to blame the refs. Have you watched the Wings recently though? You saw them tonight. We're really not that good at subtle interference. I wish we were better honestly. I see teams pretty consistently outdo us in that regard so it's puzzling how we're still the team that has the major reputation for it.

I get that it's on the person making the original statement to prove it but you have to realize how ridiculous that is given what you are asking me to prove. I'm really sorry I dont want to spend hundreds of hours proving a well documented point to a random person on the internet. Personally, I wasn't even on HF when the Wings were most famous for their subtle interference and I was able to pick it out so thats kind of a weak argument. And BTW, notice how I said "did" instead of "do" in my initial post. It was in the Babcock era that the Wings were pretty famous for the subtle interference.
 

LarKing

Registered User
Sep 2, 2012
11,958
4,896
Michigan
I get that it's on the person making the original statement to prove it but you have to realize how ridiculous that is given what you are asking me to prove. I'm really sorry I dont want to spend hundreds of hours proving a well documented point to a random person on the internet. Personally, I wasn't even on HF when the Wings were most famous for their subtle interference and I was able to pick it out so thats kind of a weak argument. And BTW, notice how I said "did" instead of "do" in my initial post. It was in the Babcock era that the Wings were pretty famous for the subtle interference.

And that's fair, I just don't think the Wings were that much ahead of other teams in that regard, if at all. They were just the poster-child for it because of media. I don't think we're as good at it now either, yet it's still mentioned almost every game.
 

Cubs2024wildcard

America F YEAH!!!
Apr 29, 2015
8,104
2,630
Even tho Mrazrek got buttered tonight, that kid is something special.

I am also staying out the whole Red Wings were interferance kings debate considering brain surgeon Eddie O failed to mention the Hawks are pretty good at it themselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad