GDT: HFBoards GDT: 12/20/2024 | 7 Games today

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
26,749
14,524
Pointing out a simple fact isn't "analysis". Like somebody pointing out how it's unusual for a good team like the Panthers to be shut out for 2 games in a row wouldn't mean they have analyzed it and are saying the Panthers will never score again. It's pointing out the occurrence that has already happened. And it doesn't require "a sample size" because it has already happened. Comprendo?
Ok, you've seen some box scores. My bad. Going with a larger sample size, that would make 3 regular season games the Panthers have been shut out since last February. The point was the conclusion you made from that, odd team or however you phrased it. Get over your semantic argument.
 

Ratsreign

Registered User
Mar 12, 2018
4,791
7,077
Pointing out a simple fact isn't "analysis". Like somebody pointing out how it's unusual for a good team like the Panthers to be shut out for 2 games in a row wouldn't mean they have analyzed it and are saying the Panthers will never score again. It's pointing out the occurrence that has already happened. And it doesn't require "a sample size" because it has already happened. Comprendo?
Two games scoreless while Barkov was out sick, and others were playing sick....besides that they were just saving it for the Oilers;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pablo El Perro

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
18,670
12,792
They only ignore them against certain teams though, right?
Yes. If you watched games you would see that. I understand they ignored many infractions in this game, I don't know who got away with more but if you are going to refuse to call penalties you don't call one at that point of the game.
I understand that the worthless pos Bennett cheapshotted neighbours and got nothing. And this is one example. If the idiots had called a 5 minute penalty the game was likely over.

Two games scoreless while Barkov was out sick, and others were playing sick....besides that they were just saving it for the Oilers;)
Nobody gives a damn why.
 

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
26,749
14,524
Yes. If you watched games you would see that. I understand they ignored many infractions in this game, I don't know who got away with more but if you are going to refuse to call penalties you don't call one at that point of the game.
I understand that the worthless pos Bennett cheapshotted neighbours and got nothing. And this is one example. If the idiots had called a 5 minute penalty the game was likely over.


Nobody gives a damn why.
You just said you didn't watch the game you're commenting on. Follow your own advice.
 

TotalHomer

Registered User
Jan 3, 2022
3,258
4,111
Yes. If you watched games you would see that. I understand they ignored many infractions in this game, I don't know who got away with more but if you are going to refuse to call penalties you don't call one at that point of the game.
I understand that the worthless pos Bennett cheapshotted neighbours and got nothing. And this is one example. If the idiots had called a 5 minute penalty the game was likely over.


Nobody gives a damn why.

You just have to watch more hockey, this is what happens. Good teams beat bad. NJ not a good team in the playoffs.
 

Ratsreign

Registered User
Mar 12, 2018
4,791
7,077
Yes. If you watched games you would see that. I understand they ignored many infractions in this game, I don't know who got away with more but if you are going to refuse to call penalties you don't call one at that point of the game.
I understand that the worthless pos Bennett cheapshotted neighbours and got nothing. And this is one example. If the idiots had called a 5 minute penalty the game was likely over.


Nobody gives a damn why.
It was call missed on Bennett, but would’ve only been a minor. They did miss other calls going each way. It happens every game and is not some grand conspiracy. The call on Barkov being tripped would be made 100% of the time.
 

SoundAndFury

Registered User
May 28, 2012
12,135
6,139
Ok, you've seen some box scores. My bad. Going with a larger sample size, that would make 3 regular season games the Panthers have been shut out since last February. The point was the conclusion you made from that, odd team or however you phrased it. Get over your semantic argument.
Yeah, imagine that someone would find it weird that they were shut out in 2 games in a row, considering the bolded part.

Seriously you are a walking logical fallacy. It's your semantic argument, not mine.

Two games scoreless while Barkov was out sick, and others were playing sick....besides that they were just saving it for the Oilers;)
Someone with actual information as to what might have caused it. A miracle. I wonder why @Pablo El Perro , who watches every game, didn't just point this out like a "mature adult" that he is.
 

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
26,749
14,524
Yeah, imagine that someone would find it weird that they were shut out in 2 games in a row, considering the bolded part.

Seriously you are a walking logical fallacy. It's your semantic argument, not mine.


Someone with actual information as to what might have caused it. A miracle.
No, my point was about your conclusion. The line you finished with, weird team. And I can only assume you don't watch much hockey or don't get sample sizes . Not sure you get logical fallacies, but that's a separate issue.
 

PBPantherfan

Registered User
Feb 7, 2010
6,839
5,297
Lake Worth, FL
Pointing out a simple fact isn't "analysis". Like somebody pointing out how it's unusual for a good team like the Panthers to be shut out for 2 games in a row wouldn't mean they have analyzed it and are saying the Panthers will never score again. It's pointing out the occurrence that has already happened. And it doesn't require "a sample size" because it has already happened. Comprendo?

"The Panthers are very inconsistent lately as determined by their extremely high variance in goal-scoring over the recent 5 games which is the deciding factor in the outcome of those" - see, that's a fact. You can move on or you can straw man further.
They have gotten points in 10 out of the last 12 games they’ve played and their record is 9-2-1 how the hell is that inconsistent?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pablo El Perro

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
18,670
12,792
Third hit from behind by Rempe. In a way it's hard to blame him since they didn't call the first 2, refs made him think it was legal.
Exactly. that's the problem. They will ignore several obvious penalties and players assume that is OK. And then they will screw a player over and decide to call one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mviewer1

Ad

Ad

Ad