JuJu Mobb
Registered User
- Dec 9, 2009
- 3,076
- 3,553
There is a vast conspiracy against certain teams.They only ignore them against certain teams though, right?
Especially the Maple Leafs, according to their fans.
There is a vast conspiracy against certain teams.They only ignore them against certain teams though, right?
Ok, you've seen some box scores. My bad. Going with a larger sample size, that would make 3 regular season games the Panthers have been shut out since last February. The point was the conclusion you made from that, odd team or however you phrased it. Get over your semantic argument.Pointing out a simple fact isn't "analysis". Like somebody pointing out how it's unusual for a good team like the Panthers to be shut out for 2 games in a row wouldn't mean they have analyzed it and are saying the Panthers will never score again. It's pointing out the occurrence that has already happened. And it doesn't require "a sample size" because it has already happened. Comprendo?
Two games scoreless while Barkov was out sick, and others were playing sick....besides that they were just saving it for the OilersPointing out a simple fact isn't "analysis". Like somebody pointing out how it's unusual for a good team like the Panthers to be shut out for 2 games in a row wouldn't mean they have analyzed it and are saying the Panthers will never score again. It's pointing out the occurrence that has already happened. And it doesn't require "a sample size" because it has already happened. Comprendo?
Yes. If you watched games you would see that. I understand they ignored many infractions in this game, I don't know who got away with more but if you are going to refuse to call penalties you don't call one at that point of the game.They only ignore them against certain teams though, right?
Nobody gives a damn why.Two games scoreless while Barkov was out sick, and others were playing sick....besides that they were just saving it for the Oilers
You just said you didn't watch the game you're commenting on. Follow your own advice.Yes. If you watched games you would see that. I understand they ignored many infractions in this game, I don't know who got away with more but if you are going to refuse to call penalties you don't call one at that point of the game.
I understand that the worthless pos Bennett cheapshotted neighbours and got nothing. And this is one example. If the idiots had called a 5 minute penalty the game was likely over.
Nobody gives a damn why.
Yes. If you watched games you would see that. I understand they ignored many infractions in this game, I don't know who got away with more but if you are going to refuse to call penalties you don't call one at that point of the game.
I understand that the worthless pos Bennett cheapshotted neighbours and got nothing. And this is one example. If the idiots had called a 5 minute penalty the game was likely over.
Nobody gives a damn why.
It was call missed on Bennett, but would’ve only been a minor. They did miss other calls going each way. It happens every game and is not some grand conspiracy. The call on Barkov being tripped would be made 100% of the time.Yes. If you watched games you would see that. I understand they ignored many infractions in this game, I don't know who got away with more but if you are going to refuse to call penalties you don't call one at that point of the game.
I understand that the worthless pos Bennett cheapshotted neighbours and got nothing. And this is one example. If the idiots had called a 5 minute penalty the game was likely over.
Nobody gives a damn why.
Yeah, imagine that someone would find it weird that they were shut out in 2 games in a row, considering the bolded part.Ok, you've seen some box scores. My bad. Going with a larger sample size, that would make 3 regular season games the Panthers have been shut out since last February. The point was the conclusion you made from that, odd team or however you phrased it. Get over your semantic argument.
Someone with actual information as to what might have caused it. A miracle. I wonder why @Pablo El Perro , who watches every game, didn't just point this out like a "mature adult" that he is.Two games scoreless while Barkov was out sick, and others were playing sick....besides that they were just saving it for the Oilers
Bennie hot whacked in the face with a stick in the first, happensIt was call missed on Bennett, but would’ve only been a minor. They did miss other calls going each way. It happens every game and is not some grand conspiracy. The call on Barkov being tripped would be made 100% of the time.
Cough* Trocheck Cough*It was call missed on Bennett, but would’ve only been a minor. They did miss other calls going each way. It happens every game and is not some grand conspiracy. The call on Barkov being tripped would be made 100% of the time.
No, my point was about your conclusion. The line you finished with, weird team. And I can only assume you don't watch much hockey or don't get sample sizes . Not sure you get logical fallacies, but that's a separate issue.Yeah, imagine that someone would find it weird that they were shut out in 2 games in a row, considering the bolded part.
Seriously you are a walking logical fallacy. It's your semantic argument, not mine.
Someone with actual information as to what might have caused it. A miracle.
They have gotten points in 10 out of the last 12 games they’ve played and their record is 9-2-1 how the hell is that inconsistent?Pointing out a simple fact isn't "analysis". Like somebody pointing out how it's unusual for a good team like the Panthers to be shut out for 2 games in a row wouldn't mean they have analyzed it and are saying the Panthers will never score again. It's pointing out the occurrence that has already happened. And it doesn't require "a sample size" because it has already happened. Comprendo?
"The Panthers are very inconsistent lately as determined by their extremely high variance in goal-scoring over the recent 5 games which is the deciding factor in the outcome of those" - see, that's a fact. You can move on or you can straw man further.
They were shutout twice. That's never happened. It's weirdThey have gotten points in 10 out of the last 12 games they’ve played and their record is 9-2-1 how the hell is that inconsistent?
What a sideshow Rempe is.
The dirtiest guy going. Kick him out of the league.Rempe is such a dumbass
I pull for him, but that was dumb, given the score even moreso.Rempe is such a dumbass
Exactly. that's the problem. They will ignore several obvious penalties and players assume that is OK. And then they will screw a player over and decide to call one.Third hit from behind by Rempe. In a way it's hard to blame him since they didn't call the first 2, refs made him think it was legal.