HFBoards GDT 11/4/2024| Two Games Today

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,357
31,287
I would like somebody to explain to me why somebody who seriously thinks that the reffing is fixed would continue to follow that sport?

I know not just a few folks whose team in whatever sport never ever loses, but is always robbed by the crooked refs. Yet, they wouldn't even think about missing a second of watching that sport the next game. There's no shortage of posters here who have this same mentality and any game where there team is behind or loses they start whining that it is all fixed. So strange.
Even stranger when the reffing really isn’t that bad
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas

jackjohnson

Registered User
Feb 9, 2021
8,023
5,264
Stanley cups say you are wrong
They were a deep team but they traded Miller due to cap instead of someone else. Miller is now a 1st line center and a great leader for Canucks. He is also rumoured to be named for team USA. So i dont see how them winning the cup is relevant when it comes to trading Miller for peanuts. This was regarding buyer beware if Tampa doesnt want a player. Miller proves that theory wrong.
 

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,357
31,287
They were a deep team but they traded Miller due to cap instead of someone else. Miller is now a 1st line center and a great leader for Canucks. He is also rumoured to be named for team USA. So i dont see how them winning the cup is relevant when it comes to trading Miller for peanuts. This was regarding buyer beware if Tampa doesnt want a player. Miller proves that theory wrong.
Two VERY different situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I am not exposed

Dust

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 20, 2016
5,911
6,947
They were a deep team but they traded Miller due to cap instead of someone else. Miller is now a 1st line center and a great leader for Canucks. He is also rumoured to be named for team USA. So i dont see how them winning the cup is relevant when it comes to trading Miller for peanuts. This was regarding buyer beware if Tampa doesnt want a player. Miller proves that theory wrong.

Most teams will happily lose a trade if it means a Cup or two.
 

fsanford

Registered User
Jul 4, 2009
7,804
3,194
They were a deep team but they traded Miller due to cap instead of someone else. Miller is now a 1st line center and a great leader for Canucks. He is also rumoured to be named for team USA. So i dont see how them winning the cup is relevant when it comes to trading Miller for peanuts. This was regarding buyer beware if Tampa doesnt want a player. Miller proves that theory wrong.
It's a chasm between the Stamkos situation and Miller
They chose cup runs over keeping a developing players. Good franchises do this.


They chose not to sign the face of their franchise knowing he was not the same player anymore. They are a smart well run franchise. And if they are moving on from a guy like Stamkos buyer beware. Cuz he wanted to stay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I am not exposed

jackjohnson

Registered User
Feb 9, 2021
8,023
5,264
Most teams will happily lose a trade if it means a Cup or two.
I think people have reading comprehension problems. I never said anything bad regarding Tampa not signing or keeping those players. I was responding to the poster who said "buyers beware" if Tampa doesnt sign their player or trades them. How is that relevant to Tampa being successful? Tampa can have success while the other team can also get a great player for cheap which proves the buyer beware theory wrong. Preds overpaying Stamkos and Stamkos underperforming doesnt make that theory a rule.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad