"Anymore" suggests that we ever knew.This is my thought. Binnington bumped into Garland & he was completely out of the play even if Garland wasn't there.
Who knows what goalie interference is anymore.
Goals aren’t the issue. Whatever defence is holding the opposition to 12 shots through 2 periods is what we need to save moving forward!Maybe I'm too used too Vegas... but perhaps the Oilers shouldn't use their months allocation of goals in one game.
If the Canucks were fighting for a playoff spot, I'd be pissed off. That said, I have no idea what goaltending interference is anymore because that contact was caused by Binnington sliding into Garland.
I guess what goals is to us, is to what saves are to you guys.Oilers are a top 3 goal scoring team in the league. I wouldn’t worry about it.
Pretty sure it was Mickey who was calling for them to go to the dressing room.Ken Daniels wondering why they’d bother to replace a broken sheet of glass with “only 1:54 left” in the period
Exactly, don't even care about the result, just what does it even mean anymore?
I thought it was a player initiating contact that prevented the goaltender from making the save. (either direct physical contact or being deep in the crease where the goaltender needs to move). Garland was definitely not those.
Helps our tank but not my understanding of the sport.
The Oilers have scores more than 5 goals 21 times this seasonMaybe I'm too used too Vegas... but perhaps the Oilers shouldn't use their months allocation of goals in one game.
It's not even that Binnington slides into Garland, it's that he slides in a direction not even close to attempting to make the save.
I thought it would count because the contact had nothing to do with Binningtons ability to make the save since he wasn't close to doing so.
Ligtning own Bettman.too many men because the Lighting player won't let the guy get off the ice fantastic garbage refs.