hangman005
Have I told you I miss Logan Thompson
Sadly I've been unable to find away to transfer Theodores injury to HanifinHanifin caught looking again but that's clearly interference.
Sadly I've been unable to find away to transfer Theodores injury to HanifinHanifin caught looking again but that's clearly interference.
Sadly I've been unable to find away to transfer Theodores injury to Hanifin
Is it goalie interference if the goalie isn't attempting to make a safe that gets interfered?
Dunno, goalie interference is mysterious. He's in the crease and did run into the goalie, true, but the goalie seems to be making no effort to make the save so I'm not sure the interference itself prevented him from making one.
Just send him a free subscription saying you're his biggest fan. Probly at least put him out until March.
Maybe if I send Theodore one too, he'll decide he'd rather play than watchJust send him a free subscription saying you're his biggest fan. Probly at least put him out until March.
You should be HFB’s in-house rules analystYes. The goalie doesn't have to be in the process of attempting to make a save in order for goaltender interference to be called.
"The overriding rationale of this rule is that a goalkeeper should have the ability to move freely within his goal crease without being hindered by the actions of an attacking player. If an attacking player enters the goal crease and, by his actions, impairs the goalkeeper's ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed."
I see, I've interpreted that as the goalie actually needs to attempt to make a save and needs to be actively hindered from doing so instead of just implying it like, "had the goalie attempted, he'd have gotten interfered" since my logic is that if the goalie didn't attempt it in the first place, he wouldn't have made the save even if there had been no interference.Yes. The goalie doesn't have to be in the process of attempting to make a save in order for goaltender interference to be called.
"The overriding rationale of this rule is that a goalkeeper should have the ability to move freely within his goal crease without being hindered by the actions of an attacking player. If an attacking player enters the goal crease and, by his actions, impairs the goalkeeper's ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed."
Oh we don't hit the net on breakaways.That break has speed, thought it would be in
Truth is, whether goalie interference is called in the third period depends on how much boozing the refs got in during the second intermission.I see, I've interpreted that as the goalie actually needs to attempt to make a save and needs to be actively hindered from doing so instead of just implying it like, "had the goalie attempted, he'd have gotten interfered" since my logic is that if the goalie didn't attempt it in the first place, he wouldn't have made the save even if there had been no interference.
The wording even in the part you quoted isn't very clear about this but I guess that that's how it works, then.
You should be HFB’s in-house rules analyst
Oh we don't hit the net on breakaways.
Vegas still has the black uniforms, but they only wear those when Donny Osmond is in the house.Does Vegas still wear black or are these mustard yellow jerseys their darks now?
Does Vegas still wear black or are these mustard yellow jerseys their darks now?
Does Vegas still wear black or are these mustard yellow jerseys their darks now?
Grey is not the new blackThat was Howdie DooDoo time.
Vegas still has the black uniforms, but they only wear those when Donny Osmond is in the house.